Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Organ removal ? Warning Graphic Photos

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Harry D View Post
    It has been theorised before that the medicos downplayed the killer's anatomical skill as their profession started to fall under suspicion.
    But a doctor or a bona fide medical person would not need to harvest organs he could legally obtain them under the guise of The Anatomy Act

    www.trevormarriott.co.uk

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Varqm View Post

      It was the people who did the inventory of Kelly's organs hands-on,the doctors,who were important.And they have to write it down,that was part of their job,they were paid for it.
      Bond or Hebbert did not write the heart was found during the inventory because they could not find it.
      Hebbert was Bonds assistant and was responsible for documenting the events including the post mortem

      www.trevormarriott.co.uk

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Harry D View Post
        It has been theorised before that the medicos downplayed the killer's anatomical skill as their profession started to fall under suspicion.
        And I think it’s a valid viewpoint Harry. None of them would have been enamoured of any possibility of the killer being one of their own.
        Regards

        Sir Herlock Sholmes

        “It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.”

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

          But a doctor or a bona fide medical person would not need to harvest organs he could legally obtain them under the guise of The Anatomy Act

          www.trevormarriott.co.uk
          You're not looking at this through the eyes of a serial killer, Trev.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

            But a doctor or a bona fide medical person would not need to harvest organs he could legally obtain them under the guise of The Anatomy Act

            www.trevormarriott.co.uk
            That’s not the point. The suggestion had been made that the killer might have been a medical man so it’s quite possible that the doctors might have either completely denied the possibility or simply downplayed it had they suspected any medical knowledge was shown.
            Regards

            Sir Herlock Sholmes

            “It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.”

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Harry D View Post

              You're not looking at this through the eyes of a serial killer, Trev.
              Or is he

              Regards

              Sir Herlock Sholmes

              “It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.”

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                One day I look forward to receiving a response from you that doesn’t involve the words “….you seek to heavily rely on?”

                Well you continually stamp your feet when someone posts something that you object to and reply with what you think the reply should be so that reply I would suggest is something that you heavily rely on

                What about the 8 year old memory of Inspector Reid that you seek to rely on?

                What about it? he was there head of The CID categorically states no organs were taken, corroborated by Walter Dew who was also involved who in his memoirs make no mention of the heart being taken

                Or Bonds inquest testimony that you seek to ignore?
                Bond never gave inquest testimony

                www.trevormarriott.co.uk



                Comment


                • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                  How many times do you need telling that there is no evidence to show how long the killer had with Eddowes

                  www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                  omg trevor how can you keep this up? of course theres evidence for this.
                  lawende saw her with a suspect at 1:35 and her body was discovered at 1:45. so the killer had around 8 minutes.
                  "Is all that we see or seem
                  but a dream within a dream?"

                  -Edgar Allan Poe


                  "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                  quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                  -Frederick G. Abberline

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                    How many times do you need telling that there is no evidence to show how long the killer had with Eddowes

                    www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                    Then how the hell can you keep saying that he couldn’t have had time?

                    If you keep digging like this Trevor you’ll be needing to ask George for a room for the night.​​​​​​​
                    Regards

                    Sir Herlock Sholmes

                    “It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.”

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Harry D View Post
                      It has been theorised before that the medicos downplayed the killer's anatomical skill as their profession started to fall under suspicion.
                      bingo harry
                      it would be natural for them to want to distance themselves and their profession from the killer.
                      "Is all that we see or seem
                      but a dream within a dream?"

                      -Edgar Allan Poe


                      "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                      quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                      -Frederick G. Abberline

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post

                        omg trevor how can you keep this up? of course theres evidence for this.
                        lawende saw her with a suspect at 1:35 and her body was discovered at 1:45. so the killer had around 8 minutes.
                        Possibly longer Abby. He might even have had 12 minutes.
                        Regards

                        Sir Herlock Sholmes

                        “It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.”

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                          That’s not the point. The suggestion had been made that the killer might have been a medical man so it’s quite possible that the doctors might have either completely denied the possibility or simply downplayed it had they suspected any medical knowledge was shown.
                          But there is no evidence to prove that, again its nothing more than wild speculation in an attempt to prove the belief that the killer had anatomical knowledge.

                          www.trevormarriott.co.uk

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                            Possibly longer Abby. He might even have had 12 minutes.
                            of course im not even accounting for people being off on their time
                            "Is all that we see or seem
                            but a dream within a dream?"

                            -Edgar Allan Poe


                            "...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
                            quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."

                            -Frederick G. Abberline

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

                              Possibly longer Abby. He might even have had 12 minutes.
                              You are another poster here who does not read the posts that have gone before

                              There is no evidence to show what time the killer and Eddowes moved off into the square they were seen at 1.35am and that time has been used to wrongly calculate how long the killer had, but the couple could have moved off as late at 1.38 for example thus reducing the time the killer had with Eddowes, the less time he had, the less time he had to do all that he is supposed to have done. its not rocket science

                              www.trevormarriott.co.uk

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post

                                But there is no evidence to prove that, again its nothing more than wild speculation in an attempt to prove the belief that the killer had anatomical knowledge.

                                www.trevormarriott.co.uk
                                Fortunately Trevor most of us don’t play by ‘Marriott Rules’ where principle's only apply in certain cases. There’s no evidence that body parts were stolen, all that you have is the existence of a trade. So you’re speculating.

                                No one’s trying to prove that the killer had medical knowledge because it can’t be proven. We don’t know. Even if he did have some he was still a maniac with a sharp knife who undoubtedly cut out the uterus and the kidney.
                                Regards

                                Sir Herlock Sholmes

                                “It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into.”

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X