Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Who cut Eddowes Apron?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Cogidubnus
    replied
    On this thread issue though, I believe the apron section recovered near the entrance to the Model Homes had on it part of the string that is used to fasten it to the wearer.

    Why would Kate herself cut off the ability to re-secure the apron on herself?
    And then wander round clutching the severed remnants...precisely Mike...

    All the best

    Dave

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael W Richards
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Hi Carol,

    Good point, it was more my little joke than anything else. Blame it on the British sense of humour, which Mike clearly has a problem with.

    But it seems that this very woman was desperate enough to go with a stranger into the darkness of Mitre Square, albeit for a bit more than a quick wipe after a very private function.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    I assure you that my lack of enthusiasm for your humor had nothing to do with your National delivery Caz.

    Oh, and the removal of "definitely" was an oversight when I edited in "most probably".

    On this thread issue though, I believe the apron section recovered near the entrance to the Model Homes had on it part of the string that is used to fasten it to the wearer.

    Why would Kate herself cut off the ability to re-secure the apron on herself?

    Best regards,

    Mike R

    Leave a comment:


  • Carol
    replied
    Originally posted by Monty View Post
    Believe it or not Carol, there is a thread about sanitary towels here on Casebook somewhere.

    Monty
    Hi Monty,

    I believe everything you say! Sounds interesting - will try and find it tomorrow. Sanitary towels are fascinating, don't you think?

    Carol

    Leave a comment:


  • Carol
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Hi Carol,

    Good point, it was more my little joke than anything else. Blame it on the British sense of humour, which Mike clearly has a problem with.

    But it seems that this very woman was desperate enough to go with a stranger into the darkness of Mitre Square, albeit for a bit more than a quick wipe after a very private function.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    Hi Caz,

    I've been an expat for too long, haven't I?

    Carol

    Leave a comment:


  • Monty
    replied
    Originally posted by Carol View Post
    Hi Chris,

    Thank you very much for your reply. Much appreciated!

    Carol

    P.S. The earliest reference to sold sanitary towels I have been able to find is in my bound copy of Home Chat for Jan-April 1896. They were advertised as 'Invaluable for Ladies Travelling and Home use. Supplied at the actual cost of washing. Hartmann's Hygienic Towelettes.' They were sold in three sizes (no measurements given) but cost 1s.0d. per dozen, 1s.4d. per dozen and 2s.0d. per dozen. You could also get the smallest size at 6d. per half dozen. The firm also advertised a 'special make for accouchement' at 2s.0d. per dozen. The firm was called 'The Sanitary Wood Wool Co. Ltd., Thavies Inn, London'.
    Believe it or not Carol, there is a thread about sanitary towels here on Casebook somewhere.

    Monty

    Leave a comment:


  • Carol
    replied
    Originally posted by ChrisGeorge View Post
    Hi Carol

    Since menstrual rags were not sold in 1888 as menstrual pads or tampons are today, it was more of an ad hoc situation so the make-shift menstrual rag might be of any size.

    Best regards

    Chris
    Hi Chris,

    Thank you very much for your reply. Much appreciated!

    Carol

    P.S. The earliest reference to sold sanitary towels I have been able to find is in my bound copy of Home Chat for Jan-April 1896. They were advertised as 'Invaluable for Ladies Travelling and Home use. Supplied at the actual cost of washing. Hartmann's Hygienic Towelettes.' They were sold in three sizes (no measurements given) but cost 1s.0d. per dozen, 1s.4d. per dozen and 2s.0d. per dozen. You could also get the smallest size at 6d. per half dozen. The firm also advertised a 'special make for accouchement' at 2s.0d. per dozen. The firm was called 'The Sanitary Wood Wool Co. Ltd., Thavies Inn, London'.

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Michael W Richards View Post
    ...the killer most probably definitely did,..
    Is that even English, Mike?

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    Little do you know
    Hi Trev,

    What I do know is that if you've been in touch with your feminine side, she's fed you a load of guff.

    Women, eh? What are they good for?

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Originally posted by Carol View Post
    I have great difficulty in believing any woman would use a public toilet in that area during the hours of darkness with a murderer on the loose. If it was me I would be thinking he might be hiding in there! But then, I am of a rather suspicious nature.

    Carol
    Hi Carol,

    Good point, it was more my little joke than anything else. Blame it on the British sense of humour, which Mike clearly has a problem with.

    But it seems that this very woman was desperate enough to go with a stranger into the darkness of Mitre Square, albeit for a bit more than a quick wipe after a very private function.

    Love,

    Caz
    X

    Leave a comment:


  • ChrisGeorge
    replied
    Originally posted by Carol View Post
    Does anyone know if the sizes of the 'menstrual rags' (or washing cloths) was recorded? I've been meaning to ask for ages but keep forgetting. Thanks to Caz for reminding me!

    Carol
    Hi Carol

    Since menstrual rags were not sold in 1888 as menstrual pads or tampons are today, it was more of an ad hoc situation so the make-shift menstrual rag might be of any size.

    Best regards

    Chris

    Leave a comment:


  • Carol
    replied
    Does anyone know if the sizes of the 'menstrual rags' (or washing cloths) was recorded? I've been meaning to ask for ages but keep forgetting. Thanks to Caz for reminding me!

    Carol

    Leave a comment:


  • Carol
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post

    Besides, I thought this area of London was awash with public conveniences like the one Daniel Dan drowned in, in Carry On Screaming. If she needed a penny for the slot I'm sure she could have sweet-talked her way into getting one, considering all the booze she managed to cadge earlier.
    I have great difficulty in believing any woman would use a public toilet in that area during the hours of darkness with a murderer on the loose. If it was me I would be thinking he might be hiding in there! But then, I am of a rather suspicious nature.

    Carol

    Leave a comment:


  • Michael W Richards
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Yeah, Mike, and I can just see the poor mare crouching in a doorway, sawing away at her precious pinny with her equally precious table knife, so she could wipe her bum or staunch her dwindling menstrual flow (and if she weighed less than 7 and a half stone her non-existent one). Twelve rags not good enough for either jobby? Wow, she must have been in a state. Her luck just got worse and worse that night, didn't it?

    Besides, I thought this area of London was awash with public conveniences like the one Daniel Dan drowned in, in Carry On Screaming. If she needed a penny for the slot I'm sure she could have sweet-talked her way into getting one, considering all the booze she managed to cadge earlier.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    I have no idea why the sarcasm, I wasnt pushing any idea other than its possible she cut her own apron because she did have a knife on her. As to why she would do so, I personally feel that she wouldnt have, and the killer most probably definitely did,.. but the possibility remains.

    Regards,
    Mike R

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Yeah, Mike, and I can just see the poor mare crouching in a doorway, sawing away at her precious pinny with her equally precious table knife, so she could wipe her bum or staunch her dwindling menstrual flow (and if she weighed less than 7 and a half stone her non-existent one). Twelve rags not good enough for either jobby? Wow, she must have been in a state. Her luck just got worse and worse that night, didn't it?

    Besides, I thought this area of London was awash with public conveniences like the one Daniel Dan drowned in, in Carry On Screaming. If she needed a penny for the slot I'm sure she could have sweet-talked her way into getting one, considering all the booze she managed to cadge earlier.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    Little do you know

    Leave a comment:


  • caz
    replied
    Caz, that white handled table knife that she had among her possessions could have been capable of cutting cloth if it were sharp enough. The requisite for a knife for the cutting of the cloth would be different than the one required for the serious knife work there, granted, but she did have a knife.
    Yeah, Mike, and I can just see the poor mare crouching in a doorway, sawing away at her precious pinny with her equally precious table knife, so she could wipe her bum or staunch her dwindling menstrual flow (and if she weighed less than 7 and a half stone her non-existent one). Twelve rags not good enough for either jobby? Wow, she must have been in a state. Her luck just got worse and worse that night, didn't it?

    Besides, I thought this area of London was awash with public conveniences like the one Daniel Dan drowned in, in Carry On Screaming. If she needed a penny for the slot I'm sure she could have sweet-talked her way into getting one, considering all the booze she managed to cadge earlier.

    Love,

    Caz
    X
    Last edited by caz; 08-10-2012, 11:19 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X