Time Factor

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lynn cates
    Commisioner
    • Aug 2009
    • 13841

    #151
    solution

    Hello Jon. Thanks. Well spotted.

    Yes, I think that, some day, all will have a simple solution.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Comment

    • Chava
      Inspector
      • Feb 2008
      • 1211

      #152
      OK, to back up, there is a school of thought that Anne Chapman had already died and was lying in the back yard when Richardson arrived, but he did not see her as the back door, which opened to the left, obscured his vision? I imagine that might be possible, but only if the small area to the left of the door--the very short arm of the 'L' of the yard--was long enough to contain Annie's body. She was around 5' tall I believe. However the description of the body says she was lying with her legs drawn up and akimbo. I don't think there is enough room between the door and the fence for this and I have always assumed that her lower half would have been visible from the back step or the yard.

      (Note to Ripperologists, did anyone look in the back yard for that piece of leather Richardson claims to have cut off? It should have been there. I doubt he would have put it in his pocket...)

      Comment

      • lynn cates
        Commisioner
        • Aug 2009
        • 13841

        #153
        dull

        Hello Chava. John later admitted that he could not cut it off so did so at work with a different knife.

        Cheers.
        LC

        Comment

        • Chava
          Inspector
          • Feb 2008
          • 1211

          #154
          Thanks LC. I'd forgotten that!

          Comment

          • Ginger
            Sergeant
            • Jan 2012
            • 780

            #155
            Originally posted by Chava View Post
            OK, to back up, there is a school of thought that Anne Chapman had already died and was lying in the back yard when Richardson arrived, but he did not see her as the back door, which opened to the left, obscured his vision?
            I've always believed that. The door not only opened to the left, but was spring-loaded. In order to free his hands up to work on his boot, I think he probably turned his back to the door as he sat down, so that it wouldn't bump against his arm while he worked. If, in getting up, he turned to the right to go back inside, he need never have seen Chapman lying there.
            - Ginger

            Comment

            • Wickerman
              Commissioner
              • Oct 2008
              • 14897

              #156
              Originally posted by Ginger View Post
              I've always believed that. The door not only opened to the left, but was spring-loaded. In order to free his hands up to work on his boot, I think he probably turned his back to the door as he sat down, so that it wouldn't bump against his arm while he worked. If, in getting up, he turned to the right to go back inside, he need never have seen Chapman lying there.
              Coroner: Was it light?

              Richardson: It was getting light, but I could see all over the place.
              Regards, Jon S.

              Comment

              • Bridewell
                Commissioner
                • Apr 2011
                • 4039

                #157
                Rising Butts

                Originally posted by Ginger View Post
                I've always believed that. The door not only opened to the left, but was spring-loaded.
                I don't know if the door is the original, but in the photograph (1960's?) it seems to have rising butt hinges. For the benefite of anyone not familiar with them, these hinges cause the door to rise an inch or so from the closed to the open position; they also causes the door to close when released. If the hinges were indeed rising butts, the notion that Richardson sat with his back against it makes a great deal of sense.
                I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                Comment

                • Bridewell
                  Commissioner
                  • Apr 2011
                  • 4039

                  #158
                  Hinges

                  Conventional Hinge:-

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	conventional hinge.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	4.9 KB
ID:	664850

                  Rising Butt:-

                  Click image for larger version

Name:	rising butt hinge.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	2.3 KB
ID:	664851
                  I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                  Comment

                  • Wickerman
                    Commissioner
                    • Oct 2008
                    • 14897

                    #159
                    Originally posted by Bridewell View Post
                    I don't know if the door is the original, but in the photograph (1960's?) it seems to have rising butt hinges. For the benefite of anyone not familiar with them, these hinges cause the door to rise an inch or so from the closed to the open position; they also causes the door to close when released. If the hinges were indeed rising butts, the notion that Richardson sat with his back against it makes a great deal of sense.
                    It does, but did Rising Butt hinges exist in the 19th century?

                    That aside, I did assume from the testimony that the backyard door closed by itself. That does not mean it was designed that way, it could easily have closed by itself because the hinges were loose, worn, mounted wrong?
                    Regards, Jon S.

                    Comment

                    • Stewart P Evans
                      Superintendent
                      • Apr 2008
                      • 2994

                      #160
                      Location of Chapman's Body

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	29 Hanbury Street Yard.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	112.4 KB
ID:	664852

                      Click image for larger version

Name:	Backyard 29 Hanbury St.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	215.2 KB
ID:	664853

                      From the Chapman inquest reports -

                      John Richardson, "It was not light, but was getting so, and was sufficient for him to see all over the place."

                      Inspector Joseph Chandler, "Her head was towards the back wall of the house, but was some 2 feet from the wall, and the body was not more than 6 inches or 9 inches from the steps."
                      SPE

                      Treat me gently I'm a newbie.

                      Comment

                      • Steve S
                        Casebook Supporter
                        • Jun 2008
                        • 378

                        #161
                        So if the body WAS there,no way it wouldn't have been seen.....whatever type of hinge...Just look at the pictures,peeps!

                        Comment

                        • Phil H
                          Superintendent
                          • Jul 2010
                          • 2362

                          #162
                          There has been discussion on here to the effect that Richardson lied at the inquest. His story changes or evolves and becomes more elaborate.

                          The assumption was, I think, that he was embarrassed to reveal to his mother that he had not bothered to check the yard that morning. If he did go, and saw the body, but did not report it, he still had to brazen it out.

                          Richardson is, in my view, not reliable.

                          If, as I believe, Chapman was killed in the dark much earlier - around the time of Nichols' murder - then there was IMHO no way Richardson could have missed it at the time he says he was there.

                          Phil

                          Comment

                          • Bridewell
                            Commissioner
                            • Apr 2011
                            • 4039

                            #163
                            Originally posted by Phil H View Post
                            There has been discussion on here to the effect that Richardson lied at the inquest. His story changes or evolves and becomes more elaborate.

                            The assumption was, I think, that he was embarrassed to reveal to his mother that he had not bothered to check the yard that morning. If he did go, and saw the body, but did not report it, he still had to brazen it out.

                            Richardson is, in my view, not reliable.

                            If, as I believe, Chapman was killed in the dark much earlier - around the time of Nichols' murder - then there was IMHO no way Richardson could have missed it at the time he says he was there.

                            Phil
                            Hi, Phil,

                            But nor, presumably, could the person (people) whom Cadosch heard in the yard of No.29 between around 5.20am amd 5.25am?

                            Thanks, Stewart for posting the photograph. Those hinges do look like rising butts to me (assuming that such things did exist at the time!). Their use would ensure that the door was self-closing. I'll shut up now though as it's not an ironmongery thread.
                            I won't always agree but I'll try not to be disagreeable.

                            Comment

                            • Phil H
                              Superintendent
                              • Jul 2010
                              • 2362

                              #164
                              Unless what Cadosche heard was someone finding the body - and then scarpering?

                              Of course, Cadosche himself is no longer a wholly unsullied witness.

                              Phil

                              Comment

                              • Hunter
                                Chief Inspector
                                • Dec 2009
                                • 1745

                                #165
                                Just a little biographical note:

                                Bagster Phillips' father had been an ironmonger ( for those of us on the left side of the pond, he ran a hardware store.)

                                Yes, thanks for the pictures, Stewart. Your valuable input is always appreciated. It looks like the seat to the privy on the ground to the left in the photo. In later years, the yard seemed to be quite a mess.
                                Best Wishes,
                                Hunter
                                ____________________________________________

                                When evidence is not to be had, theories abound. Even the most plausible of them do not carry conviction- London Times Nov. 10.1888

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X