The Tumblety Challenge

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • c.d.
    replied
    Hi Mike,

    I don't think that Tumblety spent his time in London sitting in his hotel room by himself reading his Bible. My guess is that to know Tumblety was to dislike him and that he probably rubbed everybody that he met the wrong way. (and some people particularly the wrong way if you know what I mean). A Tumblety story (and there were probably a lot of them) would make for a good story over a pint. It is quite possible that people like Littlechild had heard of him even if they never actually met him.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by mklhawley View Post
    Thanks Mike,

    It certainly was advertised much in the US once he jumped bail, and it is quite logical for Scotland Yard not to advertise their interest in him prior to his arrest (Why show your cards and screw up a future arrest?). Besides, it was policy not to discuss this with the press, BUT as in the case of Leather Apron, once he was considered NOT a suspect, the press being informed was not a big issue.

    How many of the other 380-plus JTR suspects brought in for questioning had a Chief Inspector later state in a private letter that they were a significant suspect? ...and if Tumblety was a minor suspect amonst the hundreds, how did Littlechild not only pull Tumblety's name out of a hat but also clearly recall his homosexuality and hatred of women?

    Sincerely,

    Mike
    Tumbey was notarrested in connection with the ripper murders he was arrested for gross indecency following what appears to have been some police operation. Thats how he came to have a police file. The only haterd to women appears to be towards his wife. not women persee.

    Dont forget Littlechild also mentions another suspect only this time it is in
    official police records.

    Scotland yard had ample time to interview him following his arrest. What could they screw up by doing that at that time. They either had something to put to him or they did not.

    He was so much a suspect that they didnt even bother to keep him under surveillance after he was released on bail othewise he wouldnt have been able to abscond.

    Taxi for Tumblety to the bin

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    Well seeing as you are all mouth and trousers and cant cut the mustard its best you wait a little longer.
    You know Trevor, I thoroughly enjoy when someone presents a case for a new suspect, such as you with Feigenabum, but because of your bedside manner, I love when Paul rips holes in it.

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    How many of the other 380-plus JTR suspects brought in for questioning had a Chief Inspector later state in a private letter that they were a significant suspect? ...and if Tumblety was a minor suspect amonst the hundreds, how did Littlechild not only pull Tumblety's name out of a hat but also clearly recall his homosexuality and hatred of women?

    Sincerely,

    Mike
    I would venture to guess that even among the 380 suspects that Tumblety stood out like a sore thumb.

    c.d.[/QUOTE]

    Hi c.d.,

    That is definately true for someone seeing Dr. T at a branch office or at Marlborough Street Court, but Littlechild was in the Whitehall crystal palace. It would be interesting to find out if he did see Tumblety face-to-face, though.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    How many of the other 380-plus JTR suspects brought in for questioning had a Chief Inspector later state in a private letter that they were a significant suspect? ...and if Tumblety was a minor suspect amonst the hundreds, how did Littlechild not only pull Tumblety's name out of a hat but also clearly recall his homosexuality and hatred of women?

    Sincerely,

    Mike[/QUOTE]

    I would venture to guess that even among the 380 suspects that Tumblety stood out like a sore thumb.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by The Good Michael View Post
    There are many who didn't come out and say he was a suspect. That means it wasn't advertised much. We can infer from that, that he's no more likely than anyone else. In fact, of those suspects who were refuted, by mere fact of refutation, they were more well-known and hence the denials.

    Mike
    Thanks Mike,

    It certainly was advertised much in the US once he jumped bail, and it is quite logical for Scotland Yard not to advertise their interest in him prior to his arrest (Why show your cards and screw up a future arrest?). Besides, it was policy not to discuss this with the press, BUT as in the case of Leather Apron, once he was considered NOT a suspect, the press being informed was not a big issue.

    How many of the other 380-plus JTR suspects brought in for questioning had a Chief Inspector later state in a private letter that they were a significant suspect? ...and if Tumblety was a minor suspect amonst the hundreds, how did Littlechild not only pull Tumblety's name out of a hat but also clearly recall his homosexuality and hatred of women?

    Sincerely,

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by mklhawley View Post
    Trying to steal someone else's thunder again Trevor? Simon says, have the courtesy and wait for them to present it.

    Besides, this is a red herring. You haven't answered my original question (because I know you cannot). Does anyone have any knowledge of a Scotland Yard official denying Francis Tumblety as being a Whitechapel murder suspect? –In 1888 or even years later.
    Well seeing as you are all mouth and trousers and cant cut the mustard its best you wait a little longer.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Good Michael
    replied
    There are many who didn't come out and say he was a suspect. That means it wasn't advertised much. We can infer from that, that he's no more likely than anyone else. In fact, of those suspects who were refuted, by mere fact of refutation, they were more well-known and hence the denials.

    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    Please free to enlighten the ripper world on my private information you seem to know about I am sure they would be most grateful and intrigued.

    Trying to steal someone else's thunder again Trevor? Simon says, have the courtesy and wait for them to present it.

    Besides, this is a red herring. You haven't answered my original question (because I know you cannot). Does anyone have any knowledge of a Scotland Yard official denying Francis Tumblety as being a Whitechapel murder suspect? –In 1888 or even years later.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    essence

    Hello Jonathan.

    "What I am trying to do is apply a theory, a working hypothesis, to a set of fragments which, seemingly, do not fit together. "

    I think this captures the essence of Ripper studies in general.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by mklhawley View Post
    That's why I know you have your head up your &%%. This thread is about Scotland Yard considering Tumblety as a suspect and not Tumblety being the killer. ...and I also know about that private information... Don't feel too special anymore, eh.
    Well if I do as you say have my head up my a-----. Its still not as far up as yours is up Jonathans. At least I can still see and function sensibly.

    Please free to enlighten the ripper world on my private information you seem to know about I am sure they would be most grateful and intrigued.
    Last edited by Trevor Marriott; 09-25-2011, 10:13 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jonathan H
    replied
    Thanks

    To Mike

    Thank-you very much for your kind words. That's high praise indeed!

    What I am trying to do is apply a theory, a working hypothesis, to a set of fragments which, seemingly, do not fit together.

    The theory tries to show how they can fit together.

    But a source may turn up this afternoon which shows that the theory cannot accomdate it, and this will undermine the whole super-structure immediately.

    I compare it to that trick of balancing spinning plates atop long thin poles. The more you put up, the more you have to rush back to the first set and start them spinning again.

    I believe that you can argue for Chapman via Abberline, or Tumblety via Littlechild, or 'Kosminski' via Anderson/Swanson or Druitt via Macnaghten, but that the strength of each competing argument can, to some extent, be measured by how you deal with the other top cops and their alternate chief suspects.

    Cheers Jonathan

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by Jonathan H View Post
    To Mike

    Dr Tumblety was the dominant police suspect of 1888, in my opinion.

    Ex-Chief Inspector of C.I.D, Tom Divall, one of Mac’s protégés, produced the colorfully titled memoirs, 'Scoundrels and Scallywags and Some
    Honest Men' in 1929.

    In it he wrote this:

    "The much lamented and late Commissioner of the C.I.D., Sir Melville Macnaghten, received some information that the murderer had gone to
    America and died in a lunatic asylum there. This perhaps may be correct, but after this news nothing was ever heard of any similar crime being committed."


    This is from p. 231 of 'The Lodger' by Evans and Gainey, one of the great book ever written on this subject.

    This is a scrambled egg by Sirr Melville Macnaghten, one which Jack Littlechild, I think, was trying to unscramble in 1913 by teasing out the 'Dr T' elements from the alleged chief suspect of Sims: 'Dr D.'
    I just read your article Jonathan. Brilliant! People are beginning to discover your dept of knowledge and understanding on the subject.

    Sincerely,
    Mike

    Leave a comment:


  • mklhawley
    replied
    Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
    Here we go again another post quoting from the memoirs of a retired policeman another attempt to prop up another floundering suspect. Well i can tell you from "private information" I have received Tumblety is 100% burnt toast and in the bin forever.
    That's why I know you have your head up your &%%. This thread is about Scotland Yard considering Tumblety as a suspect and not Tumblety being the killer. ...and I also know about that private information... Don't feel too special anymore, eh.

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by Jonathan H View Post
    To Mike

    Dr Tumblety was the dominant police suspect of 1888, in my opinion.

    Ex-Chief Inspector of C.I.D, Tom Divall, one of Mac’s protégés, produced the colorfully titled memoirs, 'Scoundrels and Scallywags and Some
    Honest Men' in 1929.

    In it he wrote this:

    "The much lamented and late Commissioner of the C.I.D., Sir Melville Macnaghten, received some information that the murderer had gone to
    America and died in a lunatic asylum there. This perhaps may be correct, but after this news nothing was ever heard of any similar crime being committed."


    This is from p. 231 of 'The Lodger' by Evans and Gainey, one of the great book ever written on this subject.

    This is a scrambled egg by Sirr Melville Macnaghten, one which Jack Littlechild, I think, was trying to unscramble in 1913 by teasing out the 'Dr T' elements from the alleged chief suspect of Sims: 'Dr D.'
    Here we go again another post quoting from the memoirs of a retired policeman another attempt to prop up another floundering suspect. Well i can tell you from "private information" I have received Tumblety is 100% burnt toast and in the bin forever.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X