In Melvin Fairclough's book, The Ripper and the Royals, he features a reproduction of a photograph with the heading, "The Duke of Clarence in 1910, aged 46, eighteen years after his official death in 1892" [1]
In Andrew Cook's book, "Prince Eddy," Cook mentions that Ken Linge BA, MSc, FBIPP, looked at this image and utilising techniques such as morphological, anthropometric, and biometric techiques, was able to disprove this image was Prince Eddy. [2]
The Cook Book is referenced with a list of sources at the rear, but introduction, where this point appears has no footnotes listed!
My question is thus.....
Does anybody have a copy of this report by Ken Linge?
1, The Ripper and the Royals, Melvin Fairclough, 2nd Edition, Duckworth Publishing, 2002, Image 27.
2, Prince Eddy, Andrew Cook, Tempus Publishing, 2006, P. 10
In Andrew Cook's book, "Prince Eddy," Cook mentions that Ken Linge BA, MSc, FBIPP, looked at this image and utilising techniques such as morphological, anthropometric, and biometric techiques, was able to disprove this image was Prince Eddy. [2]
The Cook Book is referenced with a list of sources at the rear, but introduction, where this point appears has no footnotes listed!
My question is thus.....
Does anybody have a copy of this report by Ken Linge?
1, The Ripper and the Royals, Melvin Fairclough, 2nd Edition, Duckworth Publishing, 2002, Image 27.
2, Prince Eddy, Andrew Cook, Tempus Publishing, 2006, P. 10
Comment