Can you see an 'FM' on the backwall in the famous Mary Kelly photograph?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

    Hi cd,

    According to Darwin, humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor. It is known that they have nearly 99% of DNA in common. Could Bigfoot and bears also share a common ancestor?

    The aboriginal people of my local area have a long term verbal history of yeti like creatures existing in our mountain wilderness. Their name for the creature is "Yowie".

    Cheers, George
    theyve been able to find the bones, skulls and other remnants of long extinct other humanoid species, obviously if bigfoot existed and was still around today they would more easily be able to do tje same. they havent because it dosnt exist.

    Leave a comment:


  • GBinOz
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post

    Saw a recent episode of Expedition Unknown with Josh Gates dealing with Bigfoot/Yeti. The best evidence samples from around the world collected over a period of years were sent to one of the most highly respected DNA testing labs in the world. Their conclusion was that in every instance the samples were from various species of bears including one species that had been thought to be extinct.

    Makes sense given the size of bears, their fur and the fact that they can stand on their hind legs. A lot of the sightings are at night or in poor conditions or at high elevations from exhausted people suffering from lack of oxygen.

    c.d.
    Hi cd,

    According to Darwin, humans and chimpanzees share a common ancestor. It is known that they have nearly 99% of DNA in common. Could Bigfoot and bears also share a common ancestor?

    The aboriginal people of my local area have a long term verbal history of yeti like creatures existing in our mountain wilderness. Their name for the creature is "Yowie".

    Cheers, George

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post

    Biologist have said that a single Bigfoot would need to be part of a tribe. The tribe would need a large territory and a large food source. They also pointed to the fact that you would expect to find at least one dead body of a Bigfoot which has never been found.

    c.d.
    Someone would probably suggest that they buried their dead c.d. Ill stick with the ‘never existed in the first place’ theory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by JeffHamm View Post
    Hi Herlock,

    Personally, I reckon mushrooms.

    - Jeff
    Hello Jeff,

    Mushrooms, weed, pills, beer plus an overwhelming desire for fame.

    Leave a comment:


  • JeffHamm
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    I reckon bears count for the vast majority of sightings c.d. ...
    Hi Herlock,

    Personally, I reckon mushrooms.

    - Jeff

    Leave a comment:


  • Lombro2
    replied
    There's been so much deconstructionism going on that people are starting to doubt that the Ripper even exists. I believe he did exist but the question is, In what dimension?

    Ike thinks he comes from the higher plane or class. That's why I call him the Woo Factor. The Ripper beamed in from the higher plane of existence and popped in through a portal in the Dark Passage of Mitre Square to slum it with the slumdwellers and the unfortunates. I appreciate that the analogy is not perfect but we believe the Ripper is from the lower echelons and lives and exists in the primitive life of the locals.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    I reckon bears count for the vast majority of sightings c.d. Factor in a bit of panic, factor in some undergrowth, factor in liars, factor in alcohol/drugs, factor in attention seeking.

    I saw one documentary where the story was that a farmer had found a Sasquatch, showed it to some people and then buried it on his property but he wouldn’t tell anyone where. The modern day researcher said, something like, but when locals/researchers dug up his land they found that he’d replaced the body with that of a plastic model!

    I felt like screaming at the TV “no you dimwit, that plastic this WAS the Sasquatch.”
    Biologist have said that a single Bigfoot would need to be part of a tribe. The tribe would need a large territory and a large food source. They also pointed to the fact that you would expect to find at least one dead body of a Bigfoot which has never been found.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post

    Saw a recent episode of Expedition Unknown with Josh Gates dealing with Bigfoot/Yeti. The best evidence samples from around the world collected over a period of years were sent to one of the most highly respected DNA testing labs in the world. Their conclusion was that in every instance the samples were from various species of bears including one species that had been thought to be extinct.

    Makes sense given the size of bears, their fur and the fact that they can stand on their hind legs. A lot of the sightings are at night or in poor conditions or at high elevations from exhausted people suffering from lack of oxygen.

    c.d.
    I reckon bears count for the vast majority of sightings c.d. Factor in a bit of panic, factor in some undergrowth, factor in liars, factor in alcohol/drugs, factor in attention seeking.

    I saw one documentary where the story was that a farmer had found a Sasquatch, showed it to some people and then buried it on his property but he wouldn’t tell anyone where. The modern day researcher said, something like, but when locals/researchers dug up his land they found that he’d replaced the body with that of a plastic model!

    I felt like screaming at the TV “no you dimwit, that plastic this WAS the Sasquatch.”
    Last edited by Herlock Sholmes; 01-27-2025, 02:58 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    I just can’t help being super sceptical George, to the point where some call me negative or bloody minded I know. Until one is actually produced I just can’t accept that they exist. We would have seen better evidence.
    Saw a recent episode of Expedition Unknown with Josh Gates dealing with Bigfoot/Yeti. The best evidence samples from around the world collected over a period of years were sent to one of the most highly respected DNA testing labs in the world. Their conclusion was that in every instance the samples were from various species of bears including one species that had been thought to be extinct.

    Makes sense given the size of bears, their fur and the fact that they can stand on their hind legs. A lot of the sightings are at night or in poor conditions or at high elevations from exhausted people suffering from lack of oxygen.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike J. G. View Post

    Patty's diaper and the separation between the thigh and the rest of the leg are in every frame, though. The "wallet" is likely not there, but the other features are, as they're not film artifacts, they're part of the costume, very similar to how Charles Gemora made his suits in the '30's.

    As for the FM, I've never really been able to see it, and it's likely a result of being a photograph of a photograph. Connecting it with a vague line from the scrapbook is a bit of a stretch, IMO.
    That label on the back gave it away Mike.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

    A bold statement indeed. I have friend from Washington state that assured me that he had both seen and smelled Bigfoot. He is an engineer, used to observing and assessing factual information. Are you aware that your opinion was generally accepted about the reputed large hairy man in central Africa until about 1908, when the mountain Gorilla was discovered?

    Cheers, George
    I just can’t help being super sceptical George, to the point where some call me negative or bloody minded I know. Until one is actually produced I just can’t accept that they exist. We would have seen better evidence.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike J. G.
    replied
    Originally posted by Lombro2 View Post
    This sounds so much like the issue with the Patterson-Gimlin Film. Most people see only a fifth or sixth generation copy, but you need to go to the original master copy to get a full appreciation of Patty.

    Bigfoot Proof…3 Images That Prove the Patterson-Gimlin Film is Real - YouTube

    This is another example of where mainstream Ripperology follows the pattern of the Bigfoot faithful and the Patterson-Gimlin believers, just so that people get the correct application of the analogy.

    As for the letter M, I see nuzzing. And I don't see the wallet on Patty's right thigh, the sagging part on the butt that looks like a separation in a costume, or where Patty stops for a second to wait for Patterson to recover himself after he trips. I see nuzzing.
    Patty's diaper and the separation between the thigh and the rest of the leg are in every frame, though. The "wallet" is likely not there, but the other features are, as they're not film artifacts, they're part of the costume, very similar to how Charles Gemora made his suits in the '30's.

    As for the FM, I've never really been able to see it, and it's likely a result of being a photograph of a photograph. Connecting it with a vague line from the scrapbook is a bit of a stretch, IMO.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike J. G.
    replied
    Originally posted by GBinOz View Post

    A bold statement indeed. I have friend from Washington state that assured me that he had both seen and smelled Bigfoot. He is an engineer, used to observing and assessing factual information. Are you aware that your opinion was generally accepted about the reputed large hairy man in central Africa until about 1908, when the mountain Gorilla was discovered?

    Cheers, George
    With all due respect, the mountain gorilla was doubted for a brief period until it was seen, verified and catalogued. We were able to do that because it was a living creature that actually left a trace of itself. We found it a long time ago...

    Bigfoot is a modern myth, and absolutely no credible evidence has ever been found because it simply doesn't exist, and it's not for a lack of looking.

    Many people get things wrong, despite their occupation. Your friend likely saw and smelled either a bear or another person. There's a 0.0% chance that he legitimately encountered a 7-10 foot tall hairy bipedal ape-man that has managed to evade science in one of the most traversed countries on earth.

    Anyway, back to Maybrick!
    Last edited by Mike J. G.; 01-27-2025, 12:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • GBinOz
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post
    The difference being that we know that Jack the Ripper existed but we know that Bigfoot doesn’t unless you count various films of men in costumes or pictures of shaded areas in undergrowth.
    A bold statement indeed. I have friend from Washington state that assured me that he had both seen and smelled Bigfoot. He is an engineer, used to observing and assessing factual information. Are you aware that your opinion was generally accepted about the reputed large hairy man in central Africa until about 1908, when the mountain Gorilla was discovered?

    Cheers, George
    Last edited by GBinOz; 01-27-2025, 12:22 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geddy2112
    replied
    The wall was wiped... it had more graffiti on it, mentioning free mason names and rituals. It was cleaned before the photo was taken to protect the high up masons. The priests from the Temples of Syrinx did it... what can this strange device be, when I touch it it gives forth a sound...

    Sorry... I'm not good at these 'seeing things' in photos. Would be nice to know who did her tattoo though.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X