Who were they?

[Iconoclast]

Where is the evidence?

If you cannot produce any evidence of the use of that expression, then that means it cannot be true.

I've forgotten what the expression was but if c.d. says he says it, that's fine with me.

[Iconoclast]

Are you denying that you called me an idiot?

No, I definitely called you an idiot, but I said it in a goodnatured tone never thinking for a moment you'd try to lead an army to Moscow to avenge the slight ...

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

But I said it so fondly - how could you be offended?

By the way, well done on the correct use of 'I' rather than 'me'.

As I say, you can stay. You can raise the general standard of spelling and grammar a bit ...

I don't need your permission to stay, but you may need to apologise for calling me an idiot if you want to stay.

[c.d.]

Hello Ike,

Would you please be so kind as to tell P. I. that I am not part of the diary crowd and am but a mere bystander and that I actually did try to warn him? Thanks.

c.d.

[Iconoclast]

I don't need your permission to stay, but you may need to apologise for calling me an idiot if you want to stay.

Ah - you buggered that up. I was going to apologise because I thought you were genuinely offended, but then I realised you were just threatening to tell tales on me to teacher so I shan’t be succumbing to blackmail, thank you.

I don’t think many of my dear readers would have read that “you idiot” as anything other than a sort of patrician goodnaturedness - a kind of parental frustration at youth unable to separate feedback from insult.

We’re done, by the way. I literally can’t deal with the literal.

[erobitha]

Hello Ike,

Would you please be so kind as to tell P. I. that I am not part of the diary crowd and am but a mere bystander and that I actually did try to warn him? Thanks.

c.d.

Maybe for the benefit of PI they should familiarise themselves with the absolute true believers of the diary being written by James Maybrick. I know only of one person. Ike has taken more shots than a Geordie stag party on a month away in Amsterdam. He has stuck to his guns in the face of attacks on his judgement, character and mental state, year after year.

PI wants a bravery biscuit for the boo-boos. I am less sensitive to their feelings than others, and you gave them fair warning. I did too. Except they took it as a fatwa when I said it. Sensitive soul.

If you want to throw stones at the glass house PI, be prepared to have rocks thrown back.

Get over yourself.

[Iconoclast]

Hello Ike,

Would you please be so kind as to tell P. I. that I am not part of the diary crowd and am but a mere bystander and that I actually did try to warn him? Thanks.

c.d.

I and all of my dear readers knew exactly what you were intending by your comment, c.d..

The thing is, to take offence at comments made by people who literally know nothing about you strikes me as the ultimate in over-sensitivity.

They should have just called me an arse and a gobshite and we’d have been friends for life!

PS Dear readers, c.d. is definitely not a diary defender. The ****** didn’t pay his subs so we kicked him out years ago.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

Ah - you buggered that up. I was going to apologise because I thought you were genuinely offended, but then I realised you were just threatening to tell tales on me to teacher so I shan’t be succumbing to blackmail, thank you.

I don’t think many of my dear readers would have read that “you idiot” as anything other than a sort of patrician goodnaturedness - a kind of parental frustration at youth unable to separate feedback from insult.

We’re done, by the way. I literally can’t deal with the literal.

You were not going to apologise just because you thought you had caused offence and everyone knows it.

I was and am genuinely offended by your calling me an idiot.

It is disingenuous of you, after all that you have written about my supposed hyper-sensitivity, then to suggest that I am not genuinely offended by being called an idiot.

It is interesting that you think I was threatening to report you for that.

I never report any other posters, however offensive their language may be.

I meant that other members, on reading what you have written about me, might not be so generous.

[c.d.]

I and all of my dear readers knew exactly what you were intending by your comment, c.d..

The thing is, to take offence at comments made by people who literally know nothing about you strikes me as the ultimate in over-sensitivity.

They should have just called me an arse and a gobshite and we’d have been friends for life!

PS Dear readers, c.d. is definitely not a diary defender. The ****** didn’t pay his subs so we kicked him out years ago.

Thanks for that, Ike (I think). Now I have to count all of those asterisks and figure out what you meant and whether I should take offense.

c.d.

[Iconoclast]

You were not going to apologise just because you thought you had caused offence and everyone knows it.

I was and am genuinely offended by your calling me an idiot.

It is disingenuous of you, after all that you have written about my supposed hyper-sensitivity, then to suggest that I am not genuinely offended by being called an idiot.

It is interesting that you think I was threatening to report you for that.

I never report any other posters, however offensive their language may be.

I meant that other members, on reading what you have written about me, might not be so generous.

We are done but you oblige me to respond.

I couldn’t give a **** what any other posters think of me (with the obvious exception of Caz as she has a seriously sharp knife). I don’t seek popularity. My dear readers stick with me because they have a dictionary and they have looked up what ‘iconoclast’ means.

I am genuinely bemused beyond all definitions of bemusement that you took offence in my avuncular use of “you idiot” and I 100% realise now that you are not my type of poster, so I will say a genuine “Sorry” that you misunderstood my intention. You do realise that I have absolutely no idea who you are, yes? How on earth could you be offended, I don’t know but my apology is the end of our unforgiving exchanges.

I have a lot more posters to insult than you, thankfully …

[Iconoclast]

Thanks for that, Ike (I think). Now I have to count all of those asterisks and figure out what you meant and whether I should take offense.

c.d.

All in the best possible taste, c.d..

(Thank you, Kenny Everett.)

[Iconoclast]

… wants a bravery biscuit for the boo-boos.

That is literally the funniest thing I have read in 2023. I very nearly spilt my cocoa!

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

I am genuinely bemused beyond all definitions of bemusement that you took offence in my avuncular use of “you idiot” and I 100% realise now that you are not my type of poster, so I will say a genuine “Sorry” that you misunderstood my intention.

You are neither genuinely bemused that I took offence at being called an idiot nor genuinely sorry for having called me an idiot.

I suppose what you mean by your 'type of poster' is someone prepared to sink to your level of civility.

[erobitha]

That is literally the funniest thing I have read in 2023. I very nearly spilt my cocoa!

I can very much believe you are a cocoa man Ike (smiley face emoji - no offence).

PI should get themselves noticed for Orsam’s blog. If they think this place is full of abuse, wait until they get their very own nickname on the brown drainpipe of shame.

[PRIVATE INVESTIGATOR 1]

I can very much believe you are a cocoa man Ike (smiley face emoji - no offence).

PI should get themselves noticed for Orsam’s blog. If they think this place is full of abuse, wait until they get their very own nickname on the brown drainpipe of shame.

That is your idea of how to have a discussion - to abuse people?

'You might regret stepping foot into this world.' (your # 288)

That's your standard of behaviour?

And you're proud of it?