Originally posted by Iconoclast
View Post
Since no such organizations exist, all you can really be saying is that you, Iconoclast Mitchell, do not find the evidence sufficient to divest you of your belief. Ditto Jay Hartley. Yet you both seem eager to make this announcement very frequently as if it is an objective fact.
It isn't an objective fact--it is an opinion, and opinions can be right, or they can be wrong.
Others will heartily disagree with your insistence and feel you are simply a poor judge of evidence--just as you and Hartley have drawn similar opinions about my own discernment, evidently finding the alleged 'FM" smeared on the backwall of Miller's Court more compelling than Barrett trying to get his mitts on a genuine blank Victorian Diary in March 1992, or seeing the 'Diego Laurenz' letter as more confirming than Anne Graham typing up a set of bogus research notes for the former "Mr. Williams."
Such is life. As you often say, 'you pay your money..." etc etc
Leave a comment: