Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Society's Pillar

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Society's Pillar

    The strongest candidate we have ever had for the author of the Whitechapel crimes is Liverpool cotton merchant James Maybrick. This is because we have a Victorian scrapbook and a Victorian watch, both of which contain confessions to the crimes. These two items of solid actual evidence are two more than any other candidate has had in the one hundred and thirty years which have passed since the crimes occurred. Above and beyond the two concrete confessions, we have significant circumstantial evidence which - if James Maybrick was actually innocent of these crimes - seem doggedly determined to place him in the frame time and time again like some sort of cosmic fit-up.

    The Maybrick story however has been clouded badly by the actions, theories, and claims of Michael Barrett, Paul Feldman, and Melvin Harris, and the dark clouds they collectively and individually created or appear to have created have hung over the case against Maybrick for a quarter of a century, during which time neither the scrapbook nor the watch have been proven to be fakes, despite the facile claims to the contrary; but neither either have they been widely accepted as authentic solutions to this most famous series of murders.

    Any momentum which existed in the investigation of the 'Maybrick diary' has long since dissipated and any hope we may ever have of solving the Ripper murders has gone with it. In a final attempt to give the scrapbook and the watch their due place in the annals of Whitechapel history, I have pulled together a short summary of the case for (and to an extent against) James Maybrick. At over one hundred pages, it is too long to post here, so I have uploaded it to the cloud where you are welcome to download it if you wish. If you do download it and - specifically - if you comment on it here, please ensure that you have read the entire document thoroughly, not simply the bits you think you might want to challenge or clarify.

    As I claim within the text, if you genuinely have an open mind on the subject, you will find it difficult to read Society's Pillar and then lean towards the notion that the Victorian scrapbook is a forgery. You might still do so, but it will be more difficult than it was before you started reading. There is a compelling case here to be made and – if digested with an open and honest mind – there is also a solution to this most famous series of crimes to be found.

    I would welcome a rebuttal from David Orsam which I would be happy to add into the document if he chooses to email me one (historyvsmaybrick@gmail.com).

    Society's Pillar can be viewed and downloaded from History vs Maybrick or sent as an email attachment if you prefer.

    Iconoclast
    March 16, 2019
    Iconoclast
    Soldier of Fortune, Man of Peace, Destroyer of Images, Nice Guy, Genius
    https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...ipart/toff.gif But apparently banned from having his favourite emoji on his signature. This is just where it starts, Comrades!

  • #2
    Updated today (pages 95-96), additional text in blue.
    Iconoclast
    Soldier of Fortune, Man of Peace, Destroyer of Images, Nice Guy, Genius
    https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...ipart/toff.gif But apparently banned from having his favourite emoji on his signature. This is just where it starts, Comrades!

    Comment


    • #3
      Hi Ike

      I just wanted to say thank you for the time and effort you’ve put into Society’s Pillar and making it available, I enjoyed it very much!

      I haven’t quite shut the door on the Maybrick Diary and if it is a hoax I agree it is quite sophisticated.

      I don’t intend to dissect what I do and don’t agree with but it was good to read a pro-Maybrick essay for a change.

      I enjoyed Society’s Pillar better than the 25th Anniversary actually.

      Nice work!

      Comment

      Working...
      X