picture of mary kelly's room

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Carol
    replied
    Hi Sam!
    Ooh, you're sharp!
    Carol

    Leave a comment:


  • Carol
    replied
    Hi Suzi,
    Nice to hear from you! My husband says I speak Svengelska (a mixture of Swedish and English), which is a rather impolite way of saying that I can't speak either language properly. So at the risk of revealing just how ignorant I am - What is a Baphomet? (Ignorance may be bliss but it can be very boring, don't you think?).
    Carol

    Leave a comment:


  • Sam Flynn
    replied
    Originally posted by Carol View Post
    Mind you, I can't see AB in Sam's photograph so as his photo doesn't fit in with my new theory I can only say that Sam's photo must be a fraud.
    Atta girl! At this rate, you'll have a best-seller on your hands in no time.

    As it is, the only "AB" you'll see on that wall would depend pretty much on Mary Kelly's blood-group.

    Leave a comment:


  • Suzi
    replied
    Originally posted by Carol View Post
    Hi Normy,
    Thanks for the photograph. I think I can make out AB joined together to the right of the centre of the part defined by the white flattened circle (I've forgotton the correct name for that shape). Yet another proof to my open mind that Alfred Brierley and Florie were having an affair before November of that year and that Maybrick was well aware of this. Mind you, I can't see AB in Sam's photograph so as his photo doesn't fit in with my new theory I can only say that Sam's photo must be a fraud. (I'm beginning to get the hang of things now).
    Lots of love
    Carol
    Hi Carol- I wouldn't get 'the hang of things' that far if I were you....can you see the Baphomet yet?? Are you writing a book on your findings?? I suggest you contact our man in Sweden!!! Hanney to Andersson come in please!!!!!!
    Last edited by Suzi; 09-07-2008, 06:57 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Carol
    replied
    Hi Normy,
    Thanks for the photograph. I think I can make out AB joined together to the right of the centre of the part defined by the white flattened circle (I've forgotton the correct name for that shape). Yet another proof to my open mind that Alfred Brierley and Florie were having an affair before November of that year and that Maybrick was well aware of this. Mind you, I can't see AB in Sam's photograph so as his photo doesn't fit in with my new theory I can only say that Sam's photo must be a fraud. (I'm beginning to get the hang of things now).
    Lots of love
    Carol

    Leave a comment:


  • Suzi
    replied
    Originally posted by Sam Flynn View Post
    Well, you may be right - except inasmuch as the alleged "26" appears on what may have once been the central cross-panel of a door, and in roughly the right place for a premise number to have been affixed:

    [ATTACH]936[/ATTACH]
    Hi chaps just starting to read through this thread again...That's a 26/8 for sure!! closer than an FM (or a FA) that's for sure!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Celesta
    replied
    [QUOTE=Ms. Fade;40342. I could be wrong though!

    Ms.F[/QUOTE]

    Or you could be right, and you probably are.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ms. Fade
    replied
    Originally posted by Mike Covell View Post
    The lower parts of the wall are typical of wooden panelling, with a door appearing on the wall. I believe the building was larger but was sectioned off at some point, to create smaller rooms.

    The upper part looks to be plaster.
    That's what I suspected - and in an area of London like that, any partitioning work was not necessarily going to be of the highest quality, perhaps reusing whatever materials came to hand. The marks could be entirely innocent, and have been there when the wall was constructed. I could be wrong though!

    Ms.F

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Covell
    replied
    The lower parts of the wall are typical of wooden panelling, with a door appearing on the wall. I believe the building was larger but was sectioned off at some point, to create smaller rooms.

    The upper part looks to be plaster.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ms. Fade
    replied
    I just wonder if anyone has ever looked into what material the wall was constructed from? The marks (I personally can't see an F and/or an M, but I wear glasses, so I could be missing it!) could have been on the wall when it was built, eg: the result of rough plastering or marks on wooden board...

    Any thoughts on this?

    Ms.F

    Leave a comment:


  • Omlor
    replied
    Billy,

    Paul is dead.

    --John

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bulger
    replied
    Originally posted by caz View Post
    Feldy is of course no longer on 'our' side.
    X
    Caz what do you mean Feldman is no longer on our side? Has he since the publication of his book denounced his own findings?

    Leave a comment:


  • Billy Bulger
    replied
    OMG Suzi thank you for uploading that! Everytime on on this forum ppl are all 'okay so when we take into account the FM on the wall...' and Im sitting here going 'what FM on the wall? I cant see anything'. So thank you for uploading that pic. In defense of Diary supporters the intials do seem a very deliberate gesture (at least to me) but in opposition to those condemning Maybrick it strikes me as weird that he would write Florence's intials on the wall even if he was sugesting that the posthumous Mary Jane represented a vision he had for his wife. Further, if the Ripper did write FM on the wall you dont need me to tell you that it could stand for anyone's initials.

    Leave a comment:


  • Normy
    replied
    Or to the left of the outline of the man we see a bat!
    The wall looks like it's a mixture of paper and wood paneling, the grain of wood could cause any number of lines and shapes to appear.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mike Covell
    replied
    Looks more like the outline a man in a large hat, with broad shoulders stood behind the bed.
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X