I was just looking at Kelly's Directory for 1946 (the oldest to hand at the moment) and noted that at that time, 'The Post House' pub on Cumberland Street was in fact known as 'The New Post Office' Public House. The proprietor was one Samuel Robert Beattie.
I have read that the name 'The Poste House' is very modern (last 30 years or so). It turns out not to be the case. The names amount essentially to the same one, although clearly the modern version has an eye to its local heritage. Still, the name for the pub was older than I expected, so then I wondered when this new Post Office was constructed.
The Post Office in question was the General Post Office, and it stood at No. 1 Victoria Street, adjacent to Cumberland Street. As far as I can tell, the two buildings stood opposite each other. The Post Office was built between 1894 and 1899 by architect Henry Tanner. It is likely that the pub was renamed to commemmorate the opening of the grand new Post Office, which was probably in 1900, a centenary year. It shouldn't be too difficult to find out if this was the case. The pub itself is of course older than this. The building dates from about 1820.
The 'New Post House', aka 'The Poste House' cannot, in fact, be referred to in a contemporary document of 1888, because the Post Office for which it was named did not at that time exist - its too early by at least 11 years. I know that the date of the name has always been a problem for the diary, but there it is, absolute proof. Older than I thought, but no, not old enough! I think arguing for an alternative 'Poste House' in London is special pleading. That being the case, I think the whole diary thing starts to look rather like a House of Cards. Bye Bye, Diary....
Oh, I also saw a couple of local Maybricks in there, wonder if they were any relation?
I have read that the name 'The Poste House' is very modern (last 30 years or so). It turns out not to be the case. The names amount essentially to the same one, although clearly the modern version has an eye to its local heritage. Still, the name for the pub was older than I expected, so then I wondered when this new Post Office was constructed.
The Post Office in question was the General Post Office, and it stood at No. 1 Victoria Street, adjacent to Cumberland Street. As far as I can tell, the two buildings stood opposite each other. The Post Office was built between 1894 and 1899 by architect Henry Tanner. It is likely that the pub was renamed to commemmorate the opening of the grand new Post Office, which was probably in 1900, a centenary year. It shouldn't be too difficult to find out if this was the case. The pub itself is of course older than this. The building dates from about 1820.
The 'New Post House', aka 'The Poste House' cannot, in fact, be referred to in a contemporary document of 1888, because the Post Office for which it was named did not at that time exist - its too early by at least 11 years. I know that the date of the name has always been a problem for the diary, but there it is, absolute proof. Older than I thought, but no, not old enough! I think arguing for an alternative 'Poste House' in London is special pleading. That being the case, I think the whole diary thing starts to look rather like a House of Cards. Bye Bye, Diary....
Oh, I also saw a couple of local Maybricks in there, wonder if they were any relation?
Comment