Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
One Incontrovertible, Unequivocal, Undeniable Fact Which Refutes the Diary
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by The Baron View Post
You forgot to thank him
It's great we get such masters of attention to detail so deeply involved in these discussions.
We are all very lucky.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by erobitha View Post
Well spotted. Nothing gets past you Barry.
It's great we get such masters of attention to detail so deeply involved in these discussions.
We are all very lucky.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
unless you're talking about being correct and actually knowing useful information about Jack the Ripper.
I don't think they would go that far John, what sets the diary defenders apart, is that they put everything valuable behind them and glorified a fake diary..
The Baron
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
Considering the Provenance of the Diary. It needs to be proven to be the real deal though. Not the other way around.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Iconoclast View PostThe March 9, 1992, double event is either a coincidence or causally linked. Why? because there are grounds to argue a causal link. The 'phone call came from Liverpool - of all places in the world - and Eddie Lyons drank in the same pub as Mike Barrett who made the 'phone call.
I couldn't help noticing that you made a similar comment over on JTR Forums, implying that Barrett's phone call could have come from anywhere in the world -- Sierra Leone, Stockholm, Tokyo, the Outer Hebrides, etc.--- yet since he made it in Liverpool this is somehow suggestive...of something...
Ah, no. It's meant to be a diary of "James Maybrick" -- a man who lived in Liverpool.
If a bloke decides to fake a diary of Jack the Ripper, and doesn't live in London, why wouldn't he choose a local chap as the victim on his hoax?
It would 'explain' --or at least make more probable--how he got hold of it. No bloke in Sierra Leone is going to use Maybrick, he's going to come up with some British bloke who lived in Africa at the appropriate time.
Use your noggin', Old Bean. That the call came from Liverpool is not random once you consider the subject of this 63-page prank.
In other words, if Barrett had lived in Sydney, his diarist would have been Frederick Deeming. If he lived in Chicago, it would have been H.H. Holmes or Neil Cream.
He's going to need to explain how it ended up in his mitts, even if it's just a lame story about the recently departed Tony Devereux.
Using a local yokel would be commonsense, and he's also more likely to know a historical figure from his neck of the woods.
- Likes 4
Comment
-
Originally posted by StevenOwl View Post
I don't believe it's the 'real deal', and yet the fact remains; so far, after 31 years of trying, nobody has proven it to be a modern forgery.
- Likes 2
Comment
Comment