This is the problem with believers who rely on "faith" rather than ...you know...reason. They are prone to to making idiotic statements of "fact": like we all agree the Diary is flawless. I mean that's pretty much indicative of the logic of people who actually believe that the Diary is true. They say it's true, so it must be. Actual evidence is irrelevant. Then they justify their faith with a caveat such as this: I mean flawless in the sense of not containing one glaring big ole flaw. Because that's what flawless means, doncha know. If you have a diamond that has several tiny chips, cracks and occlusions, you can still call it flawless as long as there isn't a great big ole crack running right down the middle.
The logic of the conman. They really need to start teaching rational thought in schools.
The logic of the conman. They really need to start teaching rational thought in schools.
Comment