If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I just Googled 'oreo cookie'. Nothing special about them - we have very similar things here, but as I don't normally eat such junk I can't comment any further.
Graham
We are suffering from a plethora of surmise, conjecture and hypothesis. - Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure Of Silver Blaze
I just Googled 'oreo cookie'. Nothing special about them - we have very similar things here, but as I don't normally eat such junk I can't comment any further.
Graham
Agreed
But I'm a sandwich short of a picnic (apperently) so please take my opinion with a pinch of salt (or bone black or arsenic if you're all out of salt)
These days I just make a big effort to limit my intake of sugar, which is now loaded into virtually every commercially-produced foodstuff you can think of.
Anyway....back to the black powder.
It was actually discovered in the spine of the book by Dr Eastaugh who thought it was possibly purified animal charcoal a.k.a. bone black. Whether he analysed it or not I don't know. At any rate, Shirley Harrison did a bit of background, and found that in the 1886 edition of Squire's Companion To The British Pharmacoepia bone black has, quote, 'the property of counteracting the effects of morphine, strychnine and aconite (arsenic)'. And 'these poisons may be swallowed with impunity if due proportion with purified animal charcoal'. I'm sure that bone black had various domestic and medicinal applications in those days, but given James Maybrick well-known taste for arsenic, I just thought it sounded...er...interesting.
Graham
We are suffering from a plethora of surmise, conjecture and hypothesis. - Sherlock Holmes, The Adventure Of Silver Blaze
But where is your evidence that Mike ever bought or borrowed 'a load of books on James Maybrick', or even on JtR for that matter?
Love,
Caz
X
I got the impression from posts by David on this very thread that Mike had taken a load of books out on James Maybrick. If David has not said this then I am wrong. However you'd be better off taking it up David.
I don't know about such people, John. I can't open my own mind to what I find a completely idiotic attachment to Mike's equally idiotic, drunken forgery claims. Only if he could have pinched someone else's creation without their knowledge or approval, might I then be open to the possibility that the writing is more recent than the 'prior to 1970' date which the Rendell team finally settled on.
I do know I have a leg to stand on, however. In fact I have two. I used them to dance with less than a week ago.
Love,
Caz
X
I've no doubt Mike is a buffoon but even a buffoon could have forged the diary and certainly someone close to a buffoon could have forged the diary.
If it was ever thrown into a skip. That claim IMHO was only made by Eddie Lyons to distance himself from allegations that he had taken the diary away from the house.
Love,
Caz
X
Pick and choose to your hearts content, In fairness though your honest opinion means zilch to me. It was stated that it had been thrown into a skip.
Comment