Originally posted by Pierre
View Post
Pierre
There was no attempt to use "Reductio ad absurdum" in my argument,
Such a claim is indeed absurd.
The post # 94
"If he was Jack the Ripper we would have known it."
Is the closest I have seen to such an argument on this thread.
This discussion began, because of the remark
"The 1888 serial killer view = The 1888 serial killer jew."
That statement gives the impression that indeed the post did exclude certain groups per definition.
Further to that it gives the impression that person under discussion was not being subjected to any criticism and analyse.
The issue was and is not, was Levy a butcher, a lunatic of a Jew, but is he a person of interest in the case.
The only way of doing that is to look at the sources relating to him.
This obviously requires a considerably time if one is to do it correctly.
I do not see any indication this has been done in posts 85,87,89, 91,94, 96,105 or 109.
steve
Leave a comment: