So Cross the Ripper got involved in the investigation. Why did he stop?

[Robert St Devil]

... Feighnbaum as I recall was not a contemporary suspect but he is a person of interest. Little interest to most but of interest...

Columbo

I,d be interested to see if a connection between Feigenbaum and Frances Cole could be made [ie. the violent attack on the jugular, the resemblance of a ship,s fireman]. All general aspects, but still curious...

{Hello Fish. Stumbled on the Tot Hots while I was following SA Spurs this season. My futbol team by default now. Just need a jersey so I can wear to next season,s Spurs games (ie. trend setter)}

[harry]

Certainly Cross was a person of interest.As was Paul,but of interest only as witnesses.Together, their information speaks of the finding and reporting of the body of Nichols.Nothing incriminating of murder can be applied to either's account,and theirs are the only submissions that matter.

[Trevor Marriott]

There is not a single flaw. There are alternative explanations. I know that is too subtle a distinction for some, but really...

I can actually prove that there are no flaws. Prove me wrong, otherwise.

Otherwise what? more threats, insults, character assassination. all cheap shots Christer but thats par for the course with you when when your theory is threatened.

I have no more time for you, or this fantasy theory you have developed. Your obsession has taken a hold on you to the point where you have lost the sense of reality in all of this.

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Columbo]

He shouldn't even be regarded as a suspect in or after 1888,

So is there a need to now prove he wasn't regarded as one ?

This man has been suggested as being a suspect without any historical proof to justify that label.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

That's true, but then many of the suspects fit in that category.

I will point out that I've always maintained Lechmere is a person of interest, as I think the only ones we can call suspects are the ones identified as such by the police in 1888. Feighnbaum as I recall was not a contemporary suspect but he is a person of interest. Little interest to most but of interest.

But as with any accusation, it's up to the accuser to prove it not the accusee. If you accuse Fisherman or anyone on this subject of mis-representing facts or whatever its up to you to prove it. I think fisherman has backed up his allegations to a great degree. There are flaws but not so much as you like to believe.

Columbo

[Fisherman]

I suggest you go and read up on the previous posts by researchers that clearly identify the flaws.
www.trevormarriott.co.uk

There is not a single flaw. There are alternative explanations. I know that is too subtle a distinction for some, but really...

I can actually prove that there are no flaws. Prove me wrong, otherwise.

[Fisherman]

Typical smart arse journalistic statement ! with the facts wrong again. I used the words "outfoxed the police"

The simple sailor did not have any contact with the police, so no reason for him to become involved with the police, or to mislead them.

But of course it has been proven that Lechmere did not mislead the police, or the coroner, and therefore was never put under suspicion, and never put under surveillance, and never ever mentioned again.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

No, it has not been proven at all. That is either a gross misunderstanding or an outright lie.

And you still need to explain why Feigenbaum could do what Lechmere could not.

And then thereīs that part with your questions again - they are non-existant, right? A bluff?

You are welcome to prove me wrong on that point.

Not gonna happen, though.

[Fisherman]

Tottenham and San Antonio... GO Spurs GO!

Yep, go Spurs! Been a Tottenham fan for many a year. Used to be the only British team where the players had heels back in the day.

[Trevor Marriott]

Has it been proven? Where's your proof? Again there is no proof, because if there was we wouldn't have this suspect.

Columbo

He shouldn't even be regarded as a suspect in or after 1888,

So is there a need to now prove he wasn't regarded as one ?

This man has been suggested as being a suspect without any historical proof to justify that label.

What has been put forward to now suggest he could be a suspect is flawed, and has proven to be so. Now as well as reading up on Feigenbaum I suggest you go and read up on the previous posts by researchers that clearly identify the flaws.

Flaws that the dynamnic duo cant see, or dont want to see.

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Columbo]

Typical smart arse journalistic statement ! with the facts wrong again. I used the words "outfoxed the police"

The simple sailor did not have any contact with the police, so no reason for him to become involved with the police, or to mislead them.

But of course it has been proven that Lechmere did not mislead the police, or the coroner, and therefore was never put under suspicion, and never put under surveillance, and never ever mentioned again.

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

Has it been proven? Where's your proof? Again there is no proof, because if there was we wouldn't have this suspect.

Columbo

[Columbo]

I find it interesting that Trevor says that a "simple carman" could not be the killer.

Apparently, though, a simple sailor could...?

I am looking forward to the explanation.

I wouldn't hold my breath for any revelations from heaven. We're gonna get in-depth on Trevors "dissemination of Lechmere" real soon.

Columbo

[Columbo]

Seems to have you nailed

No doubt!

Columbo

[Trevor Marriott]

I find it interesting that Trevor says that a "simple carman" could not be the killer.

Apparently, though, a simple sailor could...?

I am looking forward to the explanation.

Typical smart arse journalistic statement ! with the facts wrong again. I used the words "outfoxed the police"

The simple sailor did not have any contact with the police, so no reason for him to become involved with the police, or to mislead them.

But of course it has been proven that Lechmere did not mislead the police, or the coroner, and therefore was never put under suspicion, and never put under surveillance, and never ever mentioned again.

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Robert St Devil]

MRS L : Do you know if Tottenham are playing Stow up front in the big match on Saturday? He's a great header of the ball. If he can get on the end of one of Holmgren's crosses.......

Tottenham and San Antonio... GO Spurs GO!

[Fisherman]

Harry D:

Nothing fake about it. I wouldn't be amused if some armchair detectives tried to sully my descendant and my family name on such weak grounds.

The Lechmeres were okay with it - they thought it was interesting, even. So nobody is hurt. Moreover, itīs not as if Lechmere is proven not guilty - he is a very viable suspect.

Keep telling yourself that. Like I said before, it takes less assumptions to place Bury in Whitechapel than it does to take Lechmere for a serial killer.

Can you quantify that, please? Is it not true that it is always unexpected for somebody to be a serialist? It is statistically very rare. Visiting Whitechapel, on the other hand, is extremely common.
Maybe the comparison is not a very clever one?

[Fisherman]

Seems to have you nailed

A bit disturbing, that one...