Lechmere-Cross bye bye

[Ozzy]

I did say later that it looked like the person who told me meant Chris Scott, but gave me the wrong name.

Sorry for late reply GUT. I couldn't remember the name/title of this thread.
I must of missed the part you added later. Thanks for clearing that up.

[wigngown]

Haha, I'm ok, & pleased you are,

Best regards.

[GUT]

GUT,

No fear of that one. Hope you're well.

Best regards.

I'm fine but was worried about you for minute there

[wigngown]

GUT,

No fear of that one. Hope you're well.

Best regards.

[GUT]

GUT,

I didn't want anyone thinking I was supporting a theory that, in my view, has little if any merit.

Best regards.

I was worried for a moment that you were.

[wigngown]

GUT,

I didn't want anyone thinking I was supporting a theory that, in my view, has little if any merit.

Best regards.

[David Orsam]

If you think that "everyone else" merrily supports you, you are sorely mistaken.

I didn't say that everyone else "supports" me. I said that I suspect everyone else knows why you don't want to answer my questions and knows what the answers to those questions are.

[Fisherman]

I don't know why you say that. I don't care! I've already drawn my own conclusions. I believe I know why you don't want to answer my questions and I believe I know what the answers are. I suspect everyone else does too. For that, you have noone to blame but yourself.

If you think that "everyone else" merrily supports you, you are sorely mistaken. I hear quite the contrary from many sources, David.

Donīt let that keep you awake at nighttime, though.

[David Orsam]

You have noone to blame but yourself.

I don't know why you say that. I don't care! I've already drawn my own conclusions. I believe I know why you don't want to answer my questions and I believe I know what the answers are. I suspect everyone else does too. For that, you have noone to blame but yourself.

[Fisherman]

You certainly can't be said to have "got it wrong" Fisherman considering you have refused to provide the answers!

Thatīs true! And when did I start to "refuse" to answer your questions? Correct: when you refused to accept my answers.

You have noone to blame but yourself.

[David Orsam]

Up til then, I will merrily leave it to the posters to consider who got it right and who got it wrong.

You certainly can't be said to have "got it wrong" Fisherman considering you have refused to provide the answers!

[Fisherman]

Not really, because back in #631 you said that if I could conclusively prove that you had claimed as a proven fact that there is a time gap you would continue the discussion. Now it is my "attitude" that supposedly prevents it going forward. It seems to me that it's any excuse for evading my questions. Like I've said, I can't force you to answer, you are entitled to plead the fifth if you think the answers will incriminate you, I'll just have to leave your silence to speak volumes.

Yes, keep chanting it and it may become true in the end, David! Why even your notion about how "X is" and "X seems to be" are the same thing may eventually be a dream fulfilled.
Up til then, I will merrily leave it to the posters to consider who got it right and who got it wrong.

[GUT]

This was a surprise. Done a little searching and I can't find anything about it.
I'll add, for anybody wondering who I'm talking about, that Stewart is Stewart P. Evans.

I did say later that it looked like the person who told me meant Chris Scott, but gave me the wrong name.

[Ozzy]

You do know Stewart passed away?

So I if we get him in a Q&A we might have a name at last.

This was a surprise. Done a little searching and I can't find anything about it.
I'll add, for anybody wondering who I'm talking about, that Stewart is Stewart P. Evans.

[David Orsam]

I am saying that I stopped answering your questions on account of your attitude. Surely that is rather obvious?

Not really, because back in #631 you said that if I could conclusively prove that you had claimed as a proven fact that there is a time gap you would continue the discussion. Now it is my "attitude" that supposedly prevents it going forward. It seems to me that it's any excuse for evading my questions. Like I've said, I can't force you to answer, you are entitled to plead the fifth if you think the answers will incriminate you, I'll just have to leave your silence to speak volumes.