Originally posted by Lewis C
View Post
That is not quite correct, because one of the murders was committed in the City of London.
However, the City of London was within easy reach of the East End.
I think your argument is a powerful one.
The fact that the murders took place within a small area of London suggests that the murderer lived within easy walking distance of all the murder sites.
If the murderer was in fact living in France when most of the murders were committed, then he could more easily have committed murders in other places, in both England and France.
Comment