Originally posted by A P Tomlinson
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why Cross Was Almost Certainly Innocent
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by FrankO View PostBefore speculating about what route a possible JtR would or could have taken from Berner Street to Mitre Square, why would he go there at all? Wouldn't there have been other places, closer by, where to find prostitutes?
Like Whitechapel High Street, Commercial Street, Brick Lane, Leman Street? I have to add that I don't know whether there were places closer by, but I'm just wondering, because I can certainly imagine that there were.
Steve
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by FrankO View PostAs you probably know, I'm a little less outspoken than you, but for me it would certainly be an extra point against him as a suspect.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Fiver View Post
That is their argument, but it's based on speculation and ignoring everyone who wasn't Charles Lechmere. We have no idea what Lechmere's route from his old address to his work was. There is no evidence that Lechemere ever used Old Montague Street to go to work. The idea that he would walk to work using a route he no longer walked at 1am on his only day off makes no sense. The shortest route from Goulston Street of 22 Doveton would not follow Old Montague Street or Lechmere's normal route from work. Killing Stride and Eddowes would have required Lechmere to stay up 23+ hours or get up 3+ hours on his only day off.
But why let the facts get in the way of a theory.
Like Whitechapel High Street, Commercial Street, Brick Lane, Leman Street? I have to add that I don't know whether there were places closer by, but I'm just wondering, because I can certainly imagine that there were.
- Likes 2
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View PostIf it had been reported that he’d been knocked up it would be a final nail in the coffin imo.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
" Thain’s times are approximations "
As was Llewellyn's, which is odd as the time a doctor first sees a body is the only medically relevant time.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by drstrange169 View Post>>The best we can say is that, at some unknown point in time after having woken up, he (Llewellyn) learned the time from a certain timepiece (could also have been the 4 o'clock chime)<<
It's a common, and understandable misconception that Llewellyn was quoting the time he was called.
He wasn't.
He was quoting the time he arrived in Buck's Row.
I note that he mentions the time, and then states I went with the constable etc.
Thain’s times are approximations anyway, his estimate of returning ten minutes after leaving Neil is just an estimate.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
I think your wrong Fiver. Lechmere wrote all the Ripper letters, murdered the C5 and was also The Thames Torso Killer and killed numerous other women in Victorian London.
- Likes 4
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
All her other wounds are to her abdomen, there were no cuts to her clothing.
Therefore, for another cut to have been made, the killer must raise her clothing and cut her, while she is standing.
This is simply unrealistic.
Steve
Paul
- Likes 3
Leave a comment:
-
>>The best we can say is that, at some unknown point in time after having woken up, he (Llewellyn) learned the time from a certain timepiece (could also have been the 4 o'clock chime)<<
It's a common, and understandable misconception that Llewellyn was quoting the time he was called.
He wasn't.
He was quoting the time he arrived in Buck's Row. How do we know this? P.C.Thain makes it clear in his testimony that he arrived back in Buck's Row 10 mins after leaving Neil. if he left Neil around 3:45, his return must have been around 3:55.
"Witness ran for the doctor, and having called Dr. Llewellyn, accompanied him to the spot where deceased was lying. On his return with the doctor, Neil and two workmen were standing by the body. He did not know the workmen." Times
"About ten minutes after he had fetched the surgeon he saw two workmen standing with Neale." Daily Telegraph
Leave a comment:
-
>>That same logic can be applied to Schwartz's account in the Stride murder <<
Not really, Mrs Stride didn't scream continuously elsewhere, try to get into a house, then run through the streets being chased, which would be the Colville scenario.Last edited by drstrange169; 04-03-2024, 11:07 PM.
- Likes 1
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post
That's the point..
Nobody else came forward to give a different version because how could they if it didn't happen in the first place?!
It would be like coming forward to the police and saying...
"Officer, I have a different version of events to that Schwartz fellow.... It didn't happen the way he said... because nobody else saw or heard anything and I am not one for making up stories like that Packer fellow!"
RD
Did Albert Cadosch make that up ?
As many have already stated, the attack on stride could have lasted as little as 30 to seconds . There need not have been anyone else in that direct area at that exact moment othe than Schwartz ,Stride, ,B.S and pipeman .
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: