Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The cross/lechmere theory - a newbie's thoughts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Geddy2112
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post
    No, I didn't say Paul cannot be Jack the Ripper.
    Click image for larger version

Name:	Clipboard01.jpg
Views:	147
Size:	27.5 KB
ID:	837093

    Then I'm not sure what you are saying then unless you mean Paul is less suspicious than Cross...



    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

    You stated 'Did you spotted Paul alone near a freshly killed woman?!' in relation to Paul can't be JtR because he was not spotted near a freshly killed woman. I used the Peter Sutcliffe example to point out that not all killers are spotted next to a freshly killed victims.

    No, I didn't say Paul cannot be Jack the Ripper.


    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Geddy2112
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post
    What has Sutcliffe to do with a comparison between Cross the ripper vs Paul the ripper ?!
    You stated 'Did you spotted Paul alone near a freshly killed woman?!' in relation to Paul can't be JtR because he was not spotted near a freshly killed woman. I used the Peter Sutcliffe example to point out that not all killers are spotted next to a freshly killed victims.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Geddy2112 View Post

    Was Peter Sutcliffe spotted alone near a freshly killed woman? One example, no doubt 100s of others.

    What has Sutcliffe to do with a comparison between Cross the ripper vs Paul the ripper ?!



    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Geddy2112
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post
    Did you spotted Paul alone near a freshly killed woman?!
    Was Peter Sutcliffe spotted alone near a freshly killed woman? One example, no doubt 100s of others.

    Leave a comment:


  • Geddy2112
    replied
    Originally posted by Newbie View Post

    Imagine a guy killing in the morning, and then seeking out the press in the afternoon to declare he was a witness!
    You mean inserting themselves into the investigation ala Ian Huntley and many other killers...

    Leave a comment:


  • Geddy2112
    replied
    Originally posted by The Rookie Detective View Post
    Just a hypothesis of course.


    Thoughts?
    Great post, thanks. Only issue I have with that is the point Cross says he never saw/heard anyone else. However that does not rule out your theory as the Ripper might have had rubber soled shoes, the Ripper was on alert, Cross was not so the Ripper might have seen/heard Cross prior to Cross doing so vice versa. After all that is, I assume what most people who discount Cross believe what happened - maybe apart from the second visit of the Ripper.
    Last edited by Geddy2112; 07-03-2024, 10:52 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Did you spotted Paul alone near a freshly killed woman?!


    The Baron
    Irrelevant.

    You could at least try to raise the standard a little Baron.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    People that kill their wives don't usually turn out to be serial killers

    People That commit suicide don't usually turn out to be serial killers.

    But certain people already support those kind of 'suspects'



    The Baron
    Not worth a comment.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Why should I, the Police at the time already did.

    And please don't look at Kosminski.


    The Baron
    The police didn’t place Kosminski at the scene of any of the murder sites as you well know. And I’ll keep on mentioning Kosminski until you stop applying different criteria for different suspects. If it goes for Cross it goes for Kosminski. You MUST feel that Cross is a better suspect than Kosminski. If you don’t then what you’ve said about Cross is nonsense.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    People that find bodies never turn out to be the killer.


    People that kill their wives don't usually turn out to be serial killers

    People That commit suicide don't usually turn out to be serial killers.

    But certain people already support those kind of 'suspects'



    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post

    Paul is a poor suspect but he acts more suspiciously than Cross does.

    Did you spotted Paul alone near a freshly killed woman?!


    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • The Baron
    replied
    Originally posted by Herlock Sholmes View Post


    You favour Kosminski…..place him at any of the murder sites and we promise to look at him.

    Why should I, the Police at the time already did.

    And please don't look at Kosminski.


    The Baron

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    Paul the ripper was almost always an attempt to undermine the Lechmere theory, I agree that the case against Paul the talkative and attention seeker is very lean.


    The Baron
    Paul is a poor suspect but he acts more suspiciously than Cross does.

    Leave a comment:


  • Herlock Sholmes
    replied
    Originally posted by The Baron View Post


    See, you are getting it lastly, it was not that difficult was it..

    Now go put Bury at any of the murder's spots and we promise to look at him for you.


    The Baron
    People that find bodies never turn out to be the killer.

    You favour Kosminski…..place him at any of the murder sites and we promise to look at him.

    If you can’t then Cross is a better suspect than Kosminski. According to you.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X