Phil Carter:
"He had no reason I can logically see to NOT give the name Lechmere. Speculation about family reputation is pointless- but if the man WAS involved in a murder, that WOULD be reason to not have his true, family name revealed.
I don't believe he was the murderer- but his actions given his proximity to the body in giving a false name certainly are suspicious, and should be seriously taken into consideration, imho. To dismiss is to ignore the potential importance."
There is a REAL world out there...?
Get your helmet on, Phil - reason and abiding by the rules wonīt help you. But thanks anyway!
The best,
Fisherman
"He had no reason I can logically see to NOT give the name Lechmere. Speculation about family reputation is pointless- but if the man WAS involved in a murder, that WOULD be reason to not have his true, family name revealed.
I don't believe he was the murderer- but his actions given his proximity to the body in giving a false name certainly are suspicious, and should be seriously taken into consideration, imho. To dismiss is to ignore the potential importance."
There is a REAL world out there...?
Get your helmet on, Phil - reason and abiding by the rules wonīt help you. But thanks anyway!
The best,
Fisherman
Comment