Tweet
5 Minutes till Lechmere came, then again till Paul came, then till they examined the woman, and still there was breathing movements in her chest ?!
hahahahahahaha
Rainbow°
hahahahahahaha
Rainbow°
-
-
You seem to enjoy pinning a lot on these questionable "breathing movements," and you've been told that in some accounts, Paul mentions that she was probably already dead.Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
Considering the fact that the TOD and Lech's own timings are debatable, anyone trying to claim that there wasn't enough time for Nichols to have been killed prior to Lech arriving, well they have a lot of evidence that they need to find to support their case.Comment
-
No read what is written Rainbow, within 5 minutes, that means 5 minutes of less. Paul is not 5 minutes behind Lechmere he is probably less than a minute behind him.Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
From the time Lechmere sees the body it is probably no more than 2 minutes maybe 2.5 minutes before they depart to find Mizen.
SteveLast edited by Elamarna; 06-24-2017, 11:45 AM.Comment
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
Ok, 2.5 Minutes , and how long do you give the killer time between cuting her throat and the arrival of Lechmere ?!
Rainbow°Comment
-
-
-
4 Minutes here and 2.5 Minutes there..
6.5 Minutes !!!? Without even adding the time till the phantom kilker disappeared from the scene without being heared or noticed by Lechmere, 6.5 Minutes !!! and she still had breathing movements in her chest ?!
and more ... she continued bleeding till Neil came ?!
What a hell of situation Lechmere and those who are defending him are in now...
No further questions your honour!
Rainbow°Last edited by Rainbow; 06-24-2017, 12:32 PM.Comment
-
Let's just be clear :Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
1. The time from the throat cut to Paul touching her could be as little as 2.5 to 3 minutes. I work with ranges not pricise figures, because such are not possible. Your use of 6.5 minutes is at the high end of the range I suggest. To then quote just that is intentionally misleading
2. Paul was NOT certain he detected breathing, he told Lechmere he believed she was dead. He was not sure, that is clear from the testimony.
3. The time taken for another killer to go is no more than maybe 30 seconds to a minute.
Paul apparently did not notice Lechmere until close. Lechmere claimed not to notice him until he heard him about 40 yards away. If it would be no problem for Lechmere to leave the body, if he were the killer, without Paul noticing why should it be any different for another killer to do the same and just walk West down Bucks Row keeping tight to the Board School? And the time for the killer to leave is included in the times given, it does not need to be added on.
4. Bleeding again. No problem. Neil did not see blood under pressure he saw blood oozing from her wounds. Her heart had probably stopped several minutes before he arrived.
He found her probably a minimum nearly 7 minutes after the attack possibly later.
Lechmere is in no trouble, the case against him is poor and many parts of it, will in time be shown to be fundamentally flawed.
SteveLast edited by Elamarna; 06-24-2017, 12:51 PM.Comment
-
-
Hi John.Originally posted by John Wheat View Post
Yes there's a lot to come over the coming months I think. I have to say after the intense debates with Fish earlier in the week, this current round of exchanges is relatively easy.
The arguments being posted in favour of Lechmere are either pure opinion with little supporting data or even better statements that are untrue such as the post saying Mizen arrived before Thain and the two men seen by Thain as he walked towards Bucks Row junction with Brady street were most likely Paul and Lechmere.
SteveComment
-
Thank you for this post, it had told me exactly who you are.Originally posted by Elamarna View Post
I am not responding to you anymore.
Rainbow°Comment
-
Hi SteveOriginally posted by Elamarna View Post
I've yet to see anything about Lechmere supporting him as a suspect that isn't pure opinion or untrue.
Cheers JohnComment
-
Originally posted by Rainbow View Post
Rainbow.
What is untrue in that post. You do not answer questions asked of you, points are ignored over and over. Not argued against but ignored and what is posted has not been accurate in quite a few cases I do not understand how you think that is unimportant. Phrases are repeated over and over again, with little or no support.
Take for instance the "not a soul about" phrase.
No one sees Nichols enter, nor Lechmere or Paul.
The street is only checked by police for 10 minutes out of every hour.
The East and West ends are both passed by two police officers every half hour but the time spent doing this will be minimal.
That suggests that for the majority of every hour people could come and go without being seen.
And yet despite you being asked to comment on such you ignore it, so of course its harder to debate with someone who will engage in debate than someone who will not.
There are no arguments made, just repeating a phrase taken from the paper which gives just a 5 minute snapshot each half hour.
The same is true of the breathing issue. You quote a source and stick to it, there no issue there; however ignoring the fact that many of the sources which say there may have been a slight breathing, ALSO say that Paul told Lechmere he believed she was dead is an issue if you do not address that too.
Picking the bits which help an argument;whilst ignoring those that do not (cherry picking)
is not recommended if one wants to get unbias reports.
Countering such arguments is easy. And I shall continue to do so if you respond of not.
SteveComment
Comment