It has been claimed that in calling himself Charles Cross, the man who was born as Charles Lechmere gave a false name.
According to Fisherman:
"Lechmere-Cross bye bye" thread, #1, 2 October 2015,
"…my definition of a false name is any name that is not the name officially registered." (Lechmere-Cross by bye bye thread, 2 October 2015)
At a time when compulsory registration of births had only been introduced 13 years earlier, there must have been thousands of men who did not have "officially registered" names. Thus, either these men lived under false names for their entire lives or there is something wrong with Fisherman’s definition.
I suggest that it was not uncommon for men in the nineteenth century to bear two legitimate names in circumstances where they had either been adopted or had lived with a stepfather from a young age so that their "officially registered" name (if they had one) was not the name by which they were known as an adult.
Following Kattrup’s lead, I have carried out some research, starting from newspaper reports, into men who held two surnames, mainly in Victorian and Edwardian Britain. It is my conclusion that in circumstances where a man was officially registered under his father’s name but was known by his stepfather’s surname, this was not regarded as a false name but an alternative name.
In a sequence of posts in this thread I will be presenting a number of case studies and then posting some discussion about them.
According to Fisherman:
"Lechmere-Cross bye bye" thread, #1, 2 October 2015,
"…my definition of a false name is any name that is not the name officially registered." (Lechmere-Cross by bye bye thread, 2 October 2015)
At a time when compulsory registration of births had only been introduced 13 years earlier, there must have been thousands of men who did not have "officially registered" names. Thus, either these men lived under false names for their entire lives or there is something wrong with Fisherman’s definition.
I suggest that it was not uncommon for men in the nineteenth century to bear two legitimate names in circumstances where they had either been adopted or had lived with a stepfather from a young age so that their "officially registered" name (if they had one) was not the name by which they were known as an adult.
Following Kattrup’s lead, I have carried out some research, starting from newspaper reports, into men who held two surnames, mainly in Victorian and Edwardian Britain. It is my conclusion that in circumstances where a man was officially registered under his father’s name but was known by his stepfather’s surname, this was not regarded as a false name but an alternative name.
In a sequence of posts in this thread I will be presenting a number of case studies and then posting some discussion about them.
Comment