Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Arbitrary Selective Rejection and Acceptence of Coincidences

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Jeff Leahy View Post
    It starts with the death of MJK. Because thats when Cox and Sagar get on the trial of a suspect…Kosminski…

    Aaron is listed as a Hairdresser. And Trades were very important to the Kalish community it defined who they were. ANd Aaron had not worked 'At his trade' in years.
    Who said had not worked "at his trade" in years? Mr. Jacob Cohen, family friend/Wolf's business associate/possibly related by marriage said of Aaron:

    "He has not attempted any work in years" He said any work. He didn't say at his trade or any trade. You just made that up, Jeff.

    He been sort of employed as a 'Night Watchman' odd job man by his community. This community owned several shops in the Area, including Abraham's who owned a Butcher premises in Aldgate (Not occupied at Night)
    employed
    work
    No, no employment, no work. Jacob Cohen said he had not attempted any work in years,

    He'd been asked to keep watch, and took his new job very seriously, obsessively, he kept watch, watching everyone protecting his premises
    His new job.
    That's called work.

    Jacob Cohen said Aaron had not attempted any work in years.

    The man that City Detective Cox watched was not a nightwatchman. He worked during the day. He could be seen "busy as usual" during daylight hours. He took his strolls at night. They followed him.

    The man Cox watched had his shop. The man he watched was not a night watchman for someone else, he had his own shop.

    The man Cox watched saw customers. Night watchmen don't see customers.

    Jeff, that's why I asked you how much of Aaron's known record you are willing to toss out, and you said everything's on the table. Apparently you are writing a brand new script for City Detective Cox, too.

    Roy
    Sink the Bismark

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Jeff Leahy View Post
      Yeah but isn't that what my supposition is suggesting?

      You seem trying to create a single 'diagnosis' for Aaron Kosminski

      ****

      Schizophrenia has a time frame

      Yours Jeff
      It does have a time frame, but once you get the onset of delusions you are a full blown schizophrenic. And people only return to lucidity for a while. Eventually they stop normalizing and stay delusional.

      The diagnosis of Kosminski whether it a be singular or comorbidity is beside the point on this. If I can convey nothing else it is this:

      There is a massive logical disconnect when saying that someone must be Jack because they are crazy, but they are only Jack when they are not crazy. Either the disease makes him do it, or has nothing to do with it.

      If we are talking about a regular guy who is a serial killer who just so happens to be psychotic, but the psychosis is not causing him to kill, then take mental illness out of it entirely. In that case, his mental illness is like his inseam length. Of absolutely no relevance to the case at hand.

      If we are talking about a psychotic guy killing women because of his delusions, then he is not this serial killer.

      Either his illness matters, or it doesn't. It's part of the motive, or just a piece of trivia.

      If you would like to argue the merits of Kosminski being the killer when he is sane, then we don't need to discuss his mental illness at all except to point out that it might have taken him off the streets. We don't debate about what Bundy's favorite football team might have been with any sense of significance. Same thing. Delusion is a binary state. You are or you aren't. If you are it affects your behavior and beliefs. If you aren't then it doesn't.

      On the other hand, if you would like to argue that Kosminski's insanity made him a serial killer, you are going to have find different victims. Delusional people don't plan, and they are really bad at sneaking around. They do kill occasionally, but it looks nothing like the Ripper. On the other hand if he beat a prostitute to death in front of people while screaming obscenities at her... that would fit.
      The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Roy Corduroy View Post
        Who said had not worked "at his trade" in years? Mr. Jacob Cohen, family friend/Wolf's business associate/possibly related by marriage said of Aaron:

        "He has not attempted any work in years" He said any work. He didn't say at his trade or any trade. You just made that up, Jeff.

        No, no employment, no work. Jacob Cohen said he had not attempted any work in years,

        That's called work.

        Jacob Cohen said Aaron had not attempted any work in years.

        The man that City Detective Cox watched was not a nightwatchman. He worked during the day. He could be seen "busy as usual" during daylight hours. He took his strolls at night. They followed him.

        The man Cox watched had his shop. The man he watched was not a night watchman for someone else, he had his own shop.

        The man Cox watched saw customers. Night watchmen don't see customers.

        Jeff, that's why I asked you how much of Aaron's known record you are willing to toss out, and you said everything's on the table. Apparently you are writing a brand new script for City Detective Cox, too.

        Roy
        Hi Roy , I thought I'd addressed this observation but I'll re - trace with as much detail as possible.

        The Kalish community arriving in the East End bought their trades. Butchers , Bakers, Taylors etc, they started from nothing they took a raw material and they made something. Emerigration communities are often industrious and that certainly seemed the case of those fleeing from Kalish programs.

        Their trades were thus very important it definded who they were. And Aarons Trade was given as a 'hairdresser' because thats what he did. And as its specific (It doesn't say barber or Felcher) I think we can assume as his family were Taylors making high class garnets for the fashion industry that rather than someone who simply cut peoples hair, he was a trained artisan.

        Another words I think when Jacob Cohen gave his trade as 'Hairdresser' it contained a certain amount of Kudos. And not undertaking any kind of work in years was a reference to him not plying his trade, synonymous with their culture.

        I think its been generally accepted that Aaron probably stayed in the family Tayloring business doing odd jobs. I'm simply opening that idea up into something more general. He checked out the communities properties at night, may be did some tidying emptie bins. Keep him busy keep him out of harms way.

        I worked for a Jewish Jewlers for many years when I was young. I can assure you sitting around doing nothing was never acceptable, there was always a loft to clean or some painting at some property they also owned. If you were paid for a saturday you worked all day, even if it was only mopping up. (Great business learning curve it was too)

        But I'm saying I don't think the expression 'Years' tells us for sure how long. And I believe that 'work' would have implied his 'Trade' i.e. Hairdressing.

        I then clearly marked my post as 'speculation' of my new theory i.e. that Cox and Sagar are talking about the same man between Nov 1888 and March 1889, when MacNaughten says he entered an asylum.

        And the man they describe clearly occupies more than one premises, and this matches what we know about Aaron Kosminski's family, wider family and community.

        So I'm saying there is evidence to link the two.

        And if that is the case the Aaron Kosminski described was far from not being capable of work… He from time to time became insane… This is not a man eating from the gutter incapable of coherent conversation.

        You asked me if I was prepared to re-think everything we know about Aaron, and I said I was. But thats by going back to the sources and listening to what they actually say and if you do that the pieces fit far more comfortably.

        Jacob Cohen says that Aaron 'hasn't undertaken any kind of work in years' but we don't know how long 'years' would imply and its difficult to be sure what he means by 'work'. Where as MAcNaughten is very specific he says March 1889.

        Once you have that date fixed everything else slots into place.

        Yours Jeff
        Last edited by Jeff Leahy; 01-26-2015, 03:28 AM.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Jeff Leahy View Post
          MacNaughten prefers Druit as a suspect

          Yours Jeff
          Sorry what is the source for that one?

          Thanks.
          Bona fide canonical and then some.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Errata View Post
            It does have a time frame, but once you get the onset of delusions you are a full blown schizophrenic. And people only return to lucidity for a while. Eventually they stop normalizing and stay delusional.
            Actually this is quite what I was described by the expert who worked at an asylum with Schizophrenics. And still works in the field.

            He described a number of cases of young men in there early twenties on set into schizophrenia. He described above average intelligence often men in first year of university. Schizophrenia hitting in what he described a 'Psychotic ' attacks often lasting around 18 weeks and being wave like.

            He said that between attacks would be periods of recovery and that these could vary between individuals. However the impression I got was these periods were either similar in length or could be considerably longer each attack being more savers, so progressive.

            This would mean that your looking at vary different abilities of 'Function' as the illness progressed.

            Originally posted by Errata View Post
            On the other hand, if you would like to argue that Kosminski's insanity made him a serial killer, you are going to have find different victims. Delusional people don't plan, and they are really bad at sneaking around. They do kill occasionally, but it looks nothing like the Ripper. On the other hand if he beat a prostitute to death in front of people while screaming obscenities at her... that would fit.
            Well i disagree the attacks could just be random attacks during an 'early psychotic' episode. It just happened that these women were on the street and venerable. So it doesn't preclude Kosminski in the slightest.

            However that said… I had a conversation with my partner about her ex-husband (He suffer Manic depression later changed to Bi-polar but she believed he showed signs of schizophrenia) He became very obsessive about lorry's that would cross into their close near there house. They'd only do so by a few yards to back into the local B&Q. But he'd spend hours watching and waiting so he could go outside and have a go at the driver. Hundreds of letter s of complaint. He became obsessive over space and someone breaking rules.

            So if my speculation is correct about Kosminski watching shops at night perhaps these women plying the trade took on a similar obsession?

            It both facisnated and revolted him… But he became obsessive about these women. MacNaughten says he had a strong hatred of women.

            Yours Jeff

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Batman View Post
              Sorry what is the source for that one?

              Thanks.
              A to Z page 328 Abberconway version..

              Now I think about it I'm inclined to exonerate the other two but have suspicions about the first etc..

              But Errita is correct. If NacNaughten had indeed known the truth about Kosminski eventually ending up in Colney Hatch it seems unlikely he would have exhonourated him

              Yours Jeff

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Errata View Post
                . What he is likely basing his statement off of is the medical certificate. He pulled a knife on his sister. It's in his initial interviews. .
                To claim this you would have to explain why MacNaughten says Kosminski entered the Asylum in March 1889?

                If MacNaughten were working from Kosminski's Colney Hatch admission records 'attacked his sister', they are clearly dated February 1891

                So there is a direct contradiction in this reasoning

                Yours Jeff

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Jeff Leahy View Post
                  A to Z page 328 Abberconway version..

                  Now I think about it I'm inclined to exonerate the other two but have suspicions about the first etc..

                  But Errita is correct. If NacNaughten had indeed known the truth about Kosminski eventually ending up in Colney Hatch it seems unlikely he would have exhonourated him

                  Yours Jeff
                  Okay that's the one and I found it on that page.

                  So he exhonourates Kozminski and Ostrog but has strong suspicions about Dr. Druitt... who wasn't a doctor as we know.

                  The fact we have a leading investigator exhonourating Kozminski I think adds some fuel for the anti-Kozminski groups.
                  Bona fide canonical and then some.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Batman View Post
                    The fact we have a leading investigator exhonourating Kozminski I think adds some fuel for the anti-Kozminski groups.
                    I don't think it 'Adds' any fuel as it has always been the case that MacNaughten prefers Druit.

                    What I'm suggesting is that MAcNaughten doesn't really know very much. He didn't even Join the MET until some months after the murders he claims were the only victims.

                    And clearly he dates what is known about Kosminski up to March 1889. Before he arrived.

                    So if he doesn't know anything about the ID or Kosminski entering Colney Hatch. Doesn't know he threatened the life of his sister. In fact all he knows is that he from time to time became insane, he was followed and no proof could be had against him…

                    THen MacNaughten on that evidence is surely correct is he not?

                    However Anderson has a member of Kosminskis family believing him the Whitechapel murderer and a positive ID which the fellow jew would not sware too….

                    So we have two good coppers with different information coming to two logical but totally different conclusions based on which either one actually knows…

                    Ceratnly solves the biggest problems usually forwarded by Anti-Kosminski protagonists.

                    Yours Jeff

                    Comment


                    • Jeff, I know most of these women were getting on a bit but I don't think it's very gallant to call them venerable.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Robert View Post
                        Jeff, I know most of these women were getting on a bit but I don't think it's very gallant to call them venerable.
                        You'll have to excuse my dyslexia Robert…it's why I prefer a camera to the mighty pen

                        Its also bloody annoying that you only get 30minutes to correct spelling errors…I usually spot them second time around…


                        Yours Jeff

                        Comment


                        • No worries, Jeff.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Jeff Leahy View Post
                            Actually this is quite what I was described by the expert who worked at an asylum with Schizophrenics. And still works in the field.

                            He described a number of cases of young men in there early twenties on set into schizophrenia. He described above average intelligence often men in first year of university. Schizophrenia hitting in what he described a 'Psychotic ' attacks often lasting around 18 weeks and being wave like.

                            He said that between attacks would be periods of recovery and that these could vary between individuals. However the impression I got was these periods were either similar in length or could be considerably longer each attack being more savers, so progressive.

                            This would mean that your looking at vary different abilities of 'Function' as the illness progressed.

                            That's true. Early onset is getting more and more common, which is one of the big arguments for environmental factors. And sadly childhood onset is getting more common, thought still very rare. And there are few things in this life more tragic than a 7 year old girl terrified of herself.

                            There is a very real cyclical aspect to Schizophrenia. Delusion is followed by recovery, which is followed by lucidity, which is followed by delusion again. But there is a point when the structural collapse is such that recovery and lucidity are gone. The brain just shrinks to the point that regular synaptic pathways are just snarled.

                            But functionality is a different beast. There are very high functioning schizophrenics. I work with a few. Their delusions don't require a lot of action. They hold jobs, have friends, live their lives. They are delusional, but it doesn't affect them most of the time. It's rare, but it happens.

                            Delusion will override judgement every time. Otherwise it would not be a catastrophic disease. The recovery period is odd. It is an almost blank state. It's very like waking up and trying to piece together a dream that makes no sense. The delusion is gone. The belief driving the behavior is gone. The recovery period is when judgement comes back online, and a the schizophrenic is trying to make sense of what they remember. Persistent delusions make it easier, and eventually a person gets to the point where the recovery period is very short. They know what happened because it's what always happens. But during the recovery period, the sufferer is pretty quiet. Almost dreamy. Not paying attention. They are in their head trying to piece things together. But they are perfectly sane. And during lucidity they are not delusional, not hallucinating, they are perfectly normal.

                            So the only time their behavior is affected by their delusion is when they are delusional.


                            Well i disagree the attacks could just be random attacks during an 'early psychotic' episode. It just happened that these women were on the street and venerable. So it doesn't preclude Kosminski in the slightest.

                            However that said… I had a conversation with my partner about her ex-husband (He suffer Manic depression later changed to Bi-polar but she believed he showed signs of schizophrenia) He became very obsessive about lorry's that would cross into their close near there house. They'd only do so by a few yards to back into the local B&Q. But he'd spend hours watching and waiting so he could go outside and have a go at the driver. Hundreds of letter s of complaint. He became obsessive over space and someone breaking rules.

                            So if my speculation is correct about Kosminski watching shops at night perhaps these women plying the trade took on a similar obsession?

                            It both facisnated and revolted him… But he became obsessive about these women. MacNaughten says he had a strong hatred of women.

                            Yours Jeff
                            Manic depression and Bipolar are the same disease. They renamed it because they found out it was not so black and white. And some Bipolar people do have psychotic breaks. The neurochemical storm shuts down the frontal lobe and a person is left delusional and hallucinating. Usually during a manic state, and if they "come down" from the mania the psychosis will end. But there is also schizoaffective disorder, which is like the bastard stepchild of Bipolar and Schizophrenia...

                            But neither here nor there. What you are describing with the trucks is not a delusion, unless he thought that they were aliens. Nor is it a hallucination, because it actually happened. It's a manifestation of mania. People with Mania can become expansive, love everybody, they can feel indestructible, they can feel like a god. Some need to to fight. Others need to ****. But most of the time, especially because mania blocks sleep, they get really paranoid and confrontational. He saw the trucks as a defiance of HIS law. How dare they? Who the hell do these people think they are? He became confrontational. An alpha dog urinating on a wall to mark his territory. The state can lead to severe abuse in the home, and if that was the case, I'm very sorry for your partner. That's nowhere near okay. Men with full blown mania can be very scary. But it's not psychosis. It's the dopamine and adrenaline surge boosting the testosterone to intolerable levels. It creates the Uber-d ick.

                            If Kosminski became obsessed these women because of Mania, then his delusions have nothing to do with it. Unfortunately for your theory, Mania is another one of those things that shuts down the frontal lobe. In your own example, this guy did not plot elaborate revenge on the trucks, he didn't stalk them, he charged over there and got in their face. Classic.

                            We know that Jack surprised these women. They didn't scream, didn't run... they had no idea it was coming. I would imagine that those truck drivers knew you'r partner's ex was coming before they even saw him. It's like letting loose a bear. Regargless of whether or not he attacks, a bear makes an entrance. So Kosminski acting on a delusion is out, and Kosminski acting in a manic fit is out.

                            If he was just a creepy stalker who plotted elaborate and humiliating punishment for those who crossed him, I would probably expect more than just women to be killed, but if he is unsure of his own survival against another male, then yeah sure. It would not be the result of a mental illness, but it would be the result of "issues" which Kosminski had in spades. It's a motive that could apply to any pseudo authority figure in Whitechapel who might walk around feeling thwarted. It opens up a new suspect class. It points to a different type of killer, which Kosminski might be a part of. It's point the finger directly at him specifically.

                            But if that's the case, his mental illness is off the table. It's not making him kill, it's not driving his behavior. If anything it's inhibiting his behavior. If he is creepy stalker with an axe to grind, that's not mental illness. That's just who he is. So I would expect all talk of his mental illness as anything other than what possibly stopped the killings to cease.

                            I'm mentally ill. I'm bipolar. It's why I see something I think I recognize in Kosminski. And yes. Bipolar people have killed. I won't be one of them, I've been under control since I was 14. So if you ever hear that I killed my fiance, it won't be because of my mental illness. It will be because he has kept me up with his snoring for The. Last. Time. I have a temper because I am half Scottish. Not because I'm bipolar. So one of the reasons I chime in on the mental illness discussions is to try and keep things real.

                            Your partner had a right to fear her ex. And ironically not because he was bipolar. She should have feared him because he did not have enough regard for her to get himself under control. To get medicated, to see a therapist, to give up the high of the mania so that he wouldn't hurt her or others. That was his job and he failed. It was like living with a meth addict. Something was poisoning everything, and he could have controlled it, but he didn't want to give up something that made him feel good.

                            There are a lot of beliefs out there about mental illness that aren't true. And all they do is engender fear. It helps no one. It certainly doesn't help someone like me who has watched every person she ever informed of her bipolar take a step back in fear. Mental illness has rules. When I get depressed I don't walk through a department store naked shouting for King George III. No one would expect me to. Because everyone accepts that Depression has rules. But every mental illness has rules. Even schizophrenia. Perhaps not as many rules as would make us comfortable, but A+B=C. You have to know what A and B are, but they will always equal C. And not everything is controlled by a mental illness.

                            If you want to know why someone with unipolar depression likes romantic comedies so much, you want to look at the fact that she is a girl. Not that she is unipolar.
                            The early bird might get the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese.

                            Comment


                            • Errata

                              *UCK ME…Twelve years posting on **** social media and various forums. And that is the most honest reply I think, I've ever had.

                              I printed out a copy of your post and discussed with my partner. She was very moved. THank you so much.

                              As I said our best friend is Bi-polar…and we'd both trust him with our lives and yes even our wallets….its all about individuals, not mental health.

                              I will reply in detail tomorrow but we'd both like to thank you for such an open and honest post, this was very brave of you and stuck many cords in Catrin's experiences.

                              Not that I agree with you on Kosminski. But mental health is such an open and complex subject.

                              Many Many thanks

                              Jeff and Catx

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                That's true. Early onset is getting more and more common, which is one of the big arguments for environmental factors. And sadly childhood onset is getting more common, thought still very rare. And there are few things in this life more tragic than a 7 year old girl terrified of herself.
                                I agree. I guess to claim its on the increase you'd require accurate population increase and schizophrenic numbers. And as we've already agreed there also appears to be considerable world wide variations.

                                My understanding is however that there was a statistical spike in Victoria period.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                There is a very real cyclical aspect to Schizophrenia. Delusion is followed by recovery, which is followed by lucidity, which is followed by delusion again. But there is a point when the structural collapse is such that recovery and lucidity are gone. The brain just shrinks to the point that regular synaptic pathways are just snarled.
                                Yes. This is pretty much what I was described in typical on set on the condition in people early twenties. And the decent into Catatonic state averages about ten years, which would roughly fit what is known about Kosminski. This time at Leavesdon and called sometimes 'burn out'

                                This was caveated by the fact that modern schizophrenics can be treated and medication exists today to prevent this.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                But functionality is a different beast. There are very high functioning schizophrenics. I work with a few. Their delusions don't require a lot of action. They hold jobs, have friends, live their lives. They are delusional, but it doesn't affect them most of the time. It's rare, but it happens.
                                Again I totally agree. Isn't the Russel Crow film a true story about a schizophrenic who obtains a nobel Prize?

                                But thats sort of what I've been arguing. That we have no way of knowing Kosminski's functionality in early 'Psychotic' attacks, if indeed he had them.

                                I've only ever said Kosminski can't be dismissed as a ripper suspect given what is known.

                                What I've been speculating is the man watched by Sagar and Cox who entered a Privte Asylum in March 1889 might have been Aaron Kosminski. A man who from time to time became insane…

                                This fits with what we have discussed about schizophrenia. And the man they describe, if the same man, is highly functional at this time.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                Delusion will override judgement every time. Otherwise it would not be a catastrophic disease. The recovery period is odd. It is an almost blank state. It's very like waking up and trying to piece together a dream that makes no sense. The delusion is gone. The belief driving the behavior is gone. The recovery period is when judgement comes back online, and a the schizophrenic is trying to make sense of what they remember. Persistent delusions make it easier, and eventually a person gets to the point where the recovery period is very short. They know what happened because it's what always happens. But during the recovery period, the sufferer is pretty quiet. Almost dreamy. Not paying attention. They are in their head trying to piece things together. But they are perfectly sane. And during lucidity they are not delusional, not hallucinating, they are perfectly normal.
                                Sounds like a bad trip. And I don't disagree with you. But we simply have no way of knowing or ever knowing the extent or severity of Aaron's attacks.

                                The experts I've spoke to both suggest simply that he suffered a form of schizophrenia.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                So the only time their behavior is affected by their delusion is when they are delusional.
                                Your describing a 'psychotic' attack. And schizophrenics can experience psychosis and this is recognised as dangerous. However psychosis can happen in many mental states or be created by drugs and alcohol.

                                Mark Dixie committed a one off ripper style attack (Also a possible double event) and he claimed he was suffering psychosis from over indigence in cocaine and weed.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                Manic depression and Bipolar are the same disease. They renamed it because they found out it was not so black and white. And some Bipolar people do have psychotic breaks. The neurochemical storm shuts down the frontal lobe and a person is left delusional and hallucinating. Usually during a manic state, and if they "come down" from the mania the psychosis will end. But there is also schizoaffective disorder, which is like the bastard stepchild of Bipolar and Schizophrenia...
                                This is most interesting. Simply because we've had these discussions and Catrin describes symptoms (In a diagnosed bi-polar) very similar to those described in schizophrenia. The problem she has, is the person in question was self medicating with many types of proscribed drugs and mixing with alcohol. So she may simply be describing drug induced 'psychosis'

                                That said we are also dealing with high levels of 'Grandious' and religious mania. ANd split personality which she describes as the 'gollum'

                                But what it illustrates is the point you made in an earlier post. That its often very difficult to tell various conditions apart, they can carry vary similar symptoms.

                                We've both speculated that were possibly looking at a single spectrum that encompasses a number of areas of the brain. There are psychiatrists arguing syndromes. I gather the Americans have built a super brain scanner that night answer some of these questions.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                But neither here nor there. What you are describing with the trucks is not a delusion, unless he thought that they were aliens. Nor is it a hallucination, because it actually happened. It's a manifestation of mania. People with Mania can become expansive, love everybody, they can feel indestructible, they can feel like a god. Some need to to fight. Others need to ****. But most of the time, especially because mania blocks sleep, they get really paranoid and confrontational. He saw the trucks as a defiance of HIS law. How dare they? Who the hell do these people think they are? He became confrontational. An alpha dog urinating on a wall to mark his territory. The state can lead to severe abuse in the home, and if that was the case, I'm very sorry for your partner. That's nowhere near okay. Men with full blown mania can be very scary. But it's not psychosis. It's the dopamine and adrenaline surge boosting the testosterone to intolerable levels. It creates the Uber-d ick.
                                Yes I gather she spent many hours locked in her bedroom and I've witnessed the temper explosions. The ability to argue black is white. But as i said there was more than simple obsessive behaviour, believing your going to have a child who is the new messiah when your wives shad a hysterectomy being another.

                                But again this comes back to every individual case being vary different and usually very complex.

                                My partners currently writing and studying the history of the 1845 lunacy act and researching this area victorian mental health. Her background (When she wasn't an actress) was with young offenders and also Autistic and Aspergers children. So I can only assure you anything we produce together will be vary sympathetic to both sufferers and family.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                If Kosminski became obsessed these women because of Mania, then his delusions have nothing to do with it. Unfortunately for your theory, Mania is another one of those things that shuts down the frontal lobe. In your own example, this guy did not plot elaborate revenge on the trucks, he didn't stalk them, he charged over there and got in their face. Classic.
                                I can assure you plotting and paranoia were also part of his repertoire.

                                But as I said every case is unique, and we are comparing two separate conditions, even though I readily accept the possibility of cross over.

                                Thats for a psychietrist to resolve and for that they'd require One to one with a patient.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                We know that Jack surprised these women. They didn't scream, didn't run... they had no idea it was coming. I would imagine that those truck drivers knew you'r partner's ex was coming before they even saw him. It's like letting loose a bear. Regargless of whether or not he attacks, a bear makes an entrance. So Kosminski acting on a delusion is out, and Kosminski acting in a manic fit is out.
                                Without an accurate diagnosis anything is possible. We know serial killers are rare. We know mutilation sexual attacks are very rare indeed.

                                But we also know from the vary few examples that schizophrenics can on very rare occasions become…well very dangerous.

                                That might be a little chicken and egg. But to some extent without accurate statistical information examples of other schizophrenic serial killers is all we have….and thats complicated, don't forget that experts recent diagnosed Ian Brady as Schizophrenic.

                                My current interest is Harold Jones?

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                If he was just a creepy stalker who plotted elaborate and humiliating punishment for those who crossed him, I would probably expect more than just women to be killed, but if he is unsure of his own survival against another male, then yeah sure. It would not be the result of a mental illness, but it would be the result of "issues" which Kosminski had in spades. It's a motive that could apply to any pseudo authority figure in Whitechapel who might walk around feeling thwarted. It opens up a new suspect class. It points to a different type of killer, which Kosminski might be a part of. It's point the finger directly at him specifically.
                                Possibly but we know hardly anything about Aaron Kosminski or his illness.

                                So I'd argue that the period known as the autumn of terror is about the same length of time we associate with early 'psychotic' episodes.. during psychosis schizophrenics can become dangerous and for that reason Aaron can't be ruled out, even though his later records describe him as harmless…indeed that is what should be expected as schizophrenics are basically harmless, and as you have pointed out more a potential threat to themselves

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                But if that's the case, his mental illness is off the table. It's not making him kill, it's not driving his behavior. If anything it's inhibiting his behavior. If he is creepy stalker with an axe to grind, that's not mental illness. That's just who he is. So I would expect all talk of his mental illness as anything other than what possibly stopped the killings to cease.
                                Well yes, but as I said before we all score on the sociopathic and psychopathic scale… We after all require bankers.

                                So its reasonable to assume people with mental health also score on these scales.

                                So schizophrenia alone doesn't make someone a serial killer. There could be lots of reasons that happens..

                                Wasn't it Woody Allan who said Crossing a Road might be more dangerous than flying but I do that as well?

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                I'm mentally ill. I'm bipolar. It's why I see something I think I recognize in Kosminski. And yes. Bipolar people have killed. I won't be one of them, I've been under control since I was 14. So if you ever hear that I killed my fiance, it won't be because of my mental illness. It will be because he has kept me up with his snoring for The. Last. Time. I have a temper because I am half Scottish. Not because I'm bipolar. So one of the reasons I chime in on the mental illness discussions is to try and keep things real.
                                I didn't know. Thats a very brave admission, hats off to you for your honesty.

                                Clearly my partner also thinks there are similarities to bi-polar and schizophrenia. THere are a great many high functioning people with bi-polar Steven Fry jumping to mind.

                                For what its worth my partner and I are both Dyslexic and we both write for a living… interestingly we can both spot each others spelling errors and our condition manifests itself in very different ways.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                Your partner had a right to fear her ex. And ironically not because he was bipolar. She should have feared him because he did not have enough regard for her to get himself under control. To get medicated, to see a therapist, to give up the high of the mania so that he wouldn't hurt her or others. That was his job and he failed. It was like living with a meth addict. Something was poisoning everything, and he could have controlled it, but he didn't want to give up something that made him feel good.
                                Yes you hit the nail on the head. His ego loved putting her down. It wasn't physical violence but control.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                There are a lot of beliefs out there about mental illness that aren't true. And all they do is engender fear. It helps no one. It certainly doesn't help someone like me who has watched every person she ever informed of her bipolar take a step back in fear. Mental illness has rules. When I get depressed I don't walk through a department store naked shouting for King George III. No one would expect me to. Because everyone accepts that Depression has rules. But every mental illness has rules. Even schizophrenia. Perhaps not as many rules as would make us comfortable, but A+B=C. You have to know what A and B are, but they will always equal C. And not everything is controlled by a mental illness.
                                Yes I get this. The condition itself doesn't make someone dangerous, and most people learn to deal with and over come, and should be admired and congratulated for doing so.

                                I'm certainly not suggesting Kosminski was Jack the Ripper simply because he suffered schizophrenia. I believe it because thats what Anderson and Swanson tells us and they were in the position to know more than anyone else. I'm saying that schizophrenia don't rule him out of their belief being correct.

                                Originally posted by Errata View Post
                                If you want to know why someone with unipolar depression likes romantic comedies so much, you want to look at the fact that she is a girl. Not that she is unipolar.
                                Yeah but as Woody Allan says 'she does that as well'

                                Many thanks

                                Yours Jeff
                                Last edited by Jeff Leahy; 01-27-2015, 07:34 AM.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X