Originally posted by Simon Wood
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Kosminski and Victim DNA Match on Shawl
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Caligo Umbrator,
What a stupid nom de plume. It sounds like a Roman sex-toy.
Would the words "Daily" and "Express" mean anything to you?
Just a hunch.
Regards,
Simon
I see you're quite a senior here and I'm a new recruit, so I'll take the comment on my nom de plume on the chin.
I'm unfamiliar with roman sex toys, however, so I'll defer to your knowledge on that matter.
The Daily Express is of course a national British newspaper. I haven't read it recently so am curious as to why you'd ask me about it.
That is unless you were engaging in a little word play and intended to meant 'express' something 'daily'.
What is your hunch?https://forum.casebook.org/core/imag...rt/flag_uk.gif "I know why the sun never sets on the British Empire: God wouldn't trust an Englishman in the dark."
Comment
-
Originally posted by Caligo Umbrator View PostWith all the talk about the relatives and mDNA of Eddowes, I was wondering has anyone given any thought to Kozminski and his relatives?
My understanding is that the relative of his who was tested has elected to remain anonymous, which obviously puts us all at some disadvantage in verifying any claims made about the continuity of the bloodline.
Unfortunately I don't have the resources to do this myself but was wondering if he even had any living, verifiable relatives.
I ask that because I read this thread a couple of days ago about that -
http://forum.casebook.org/showthread.php?t=4140
Does anyone have any new information about this line of enquiry?
But I can confirm that Russell Edwards's 'M' is indeed a descendant in the direct female line of Aaron's sister Matilda.
The Zena Shine mentioned in the thread you link to is clearly not a descendant of either of Aaron's brothers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick S View PostIt's been stated before here and it's stated in the book (which I've finally received and will begin soon). Edwards was told (by a police official?) that the top brass at the time of murders knew who Jack the Ripper was: Aaron Kozminski. That's his story anyway. While it seems a stretch to me, it might well be the route a neophyte with no real insight into the case might take upon being told such a thing.
Not saying a buy it. Just saying......Three things in life that don't stay hidden for to long ones the sun ones the moon and the other is the truth
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick S View PostIt's been stated before here and it's stated in the book (which I've finally received and will begin soon). Edwards was told (by a police official?) that the top brass at the time of murders knew who Jack the Ripper was: Aaron Kozminski. That's his story anyway. While it seems a stretch to me, it might well be the route a neophyte with no real insight into the case might take upon being told such a thing.
Not saying a buy it. Just saying......
Comment
-
Originally posted by Phil Carter View PostBut this shawl business is a joke and like Stewart Evans has repeatedly said... always has been seen as a fake. For people like Neil (a fine example I will use) and many others it is an affront to seriously researched Ripperology.
However I fully expect this Edwards fellow will find support from within the same publisher's authors lists. That would not surprise me one iota.
I wonder why exactly?
Phil
It appears to have been demonstrated that this is not the case.
Add to that, that it appears we have a positive blood match to Catherine Eddows…and it seems fairly unlikely that it was not at least close to her person when killed…
So the provenance is irrelevant as long as the Science says 'it's Eddows Blood'
I'd say that was pretty simple to understand.
Yours Jeff
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jeff Leahy View PostITs always been perceived wisdom by the Ripper community that the Shawl was Edwardian…Not that it was fake.
"There is no suggestion of calculated deception on anyone's part: it is doubted that the shawl was really Eddowes' - for example, it is a costly item and therefore improbable that she might have possessed it and no such item is mentioned in descriptions of her, or her possessions and clothing."
Of course, one suggestion is that the "shawl" might have belonged to the victim of a different crime, and that a mistaken family tradition might have associated it with Eddowes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Chris View PostRob House and I did a lot of research a few years ago on Aaron Kozminski's relations.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Simon Wood View PostHi Caligo Umbrator,
What a stupid nom de plume. It sounds like a Roman sex-toy.
Would the words "Daily" and "Express" mean anything to you?
Just a hunch.
Regards,
SimonMick Reed
Whatever happened to scepticism?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick S View PostEdwards was told (by a police official?) that the top brass at the time of murders knew who Jack the Ripper was: Aaron Kozminski.
I assume that the CM people don't have any records stashed away that no-one else is privy to. If that's the case, then the most they could know is that a 'Kosminski' was a suspect - and that he'd been 'exonerated' by at least one leading figure of the time..
Nobody had ever heard of Aaron in this connection until (I think) 1987 when Martin Fido discovered him in an asylum.
Now Fido was far too cute to say for sure that Aaron and 'Kosminski' were, 'beyond doubt' the same man.
Would that Edwards had his wisdom, and would that so many Ripper researchers had it too.Mick Reed
Whatever happened to scepticism?
Comment
Comment