Originally posted by Trevor Marriott
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Okay, Ripperologists, prove it's NOT him :)
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by rjpalmer View Post
I, of course, agree that the whole thing is a fake, but for the sake of accuracy the "table runner" theory was just a throw-away suggestion made by someone who was visiting the Black Museum. It was not an expert opinion but has taken on quite a life of its own.
Debrah Arif has convinced me that, as strange as it may sound, there were fancy dress shawls of this same dimension and general description in the Victorian era.
Post #132 at the link below if you want to see one.
New edition of Russell Edwards, "Naming Jack the Ripper" (2024) - Jack The Ripper Forums - Ripperology For The 21st Century
I don't want to imply that this helps Edwards' claims, but it could, in the end, be a shawl.
Anyway, I believe Edwards has now changed his theory to imply or suggest this was some ceremonial object carried by Aaron Kozminski, so he has side-stepped its non-appearance in the City of London inventory list.
As for the implication that Mr Ripper Aaron Kosminski went out looking for victims carrying a 9ft long tablecloth that he used for Jewish ceremonial purposes - hmmmmm...
For now we see through a glass darkly, but then, face to face.
Now I know in part, but then shall I know even as also I am known.
Comment
-
A dark green chintz skirt with michaelmas daisies and gold Lillie's is not a shawl, and does not look like the garment Russel Edward's shows. It's unfortunate he bid on it and now has to keep recovering his cost.
There is nothing that ties Aaron Kozminski to these murders. Unless it's one episode where he chased his sister or brothers daughter with some hairdresser scissors.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Filby View Post
I don't see the sketch as fully indicative of what she was wearing either.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Patrick Differ View PostA dark green chintz skirt with michaelmas daisies and gold Lillie's is not a shawl, and does not look like the garment Russel Edward's shows. It's unfortunate he bid on it and now has to keep recovering his cost.
There is nothing that ties Aaron Kozminski to these murders. Unless it's one episode where he chased his sister or brothers daughter with some hairdresser scissors.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Trevor Marriott View Post
Well, there is nothing remotely resembling anything that could be a shawl !!!!!!!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by MrTwibbs View PostIs there any truth in Scotland Yard’s Black Museum declining to display the scrap they cut from the shawl in the 1990s because they were not convinced of its authenticity?
If they thought it was authentic, would they have taken a pair of scissors to it?
- Likes 6
Comment
-
THE EAST-END MURDERS. MITRE SQUARE VERDICT.
Mr. S.F. Langham resumed the inquiry on Thursday at the Golden-lane mortuary, Barbican, respecting the death of Catherine Eddowes…
Joseph Lawende deposed: I live at 45, Norfolk-road, Dalston, and am a commercial traveler. On the night of the 29th September I was at the Imperial club, in the company of Mr. Joseph Levy and Mr. Harry Harris. It was raining, and we could not leave the premises. We were sitting in the club chatting…
Mr. Joseph Hyam Levy, butcher, of 1, Hutcheson-street, Aldgate, deposed: I was at the Imperial club on the night in question with the last witness. We left about three or four minutes past the half-hour (half-past one)…
Lloyd’s Weekly, Sunday, October 14, 1888
Dr. Louhelainen himself stated that the blue indigo dye on the shawl was water soluble and would streak. Russell Edwards claimed Kosminski brought the shawl with him to the murder, meaning he had it outdoors. It was raining at that very time, yet there is no evidence of streaking on the shawl.
The Ripper's Haunts/JtR Suspect Dr. Francis Tumblety (Sunbury Press)
http://www.michaelLhawley.com
Comment
-
Comment