JTR as a disorganized schizophrenic lust murderer

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lynn cates
    replied
    anarchist theory

    Hello Malcolm. Ironic you should say that. The Anarchists considered marriage itself a form of prostitution.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    parts

    Hello (again) David. And some of those parts, I believe, belonged to Annie Chapman.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    obvious?

    Hello David. Yes.

    Obvious? Not to me. Once had a professor who said that "obviously" and "clearly" when put into a math proof probably meant you were losing the thread of it.

    Think he was right.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • D.B.Wagstaff
    replied
    I have absolutely no evidence upon which to base this half-baked speculation, but here is a thought:

    We know "Jack", or whatever his real name was, was good with a knife, and there seems to be some indications he was physically capable of disabling his victims - choking them unconscious, and possibly a blow to the head.

    We know he took some risks, including carrying out his crimes in places where he could have been discovered or cornered.

    Maybe Jack was a tough guy who knew how to handle himself and was pretty confident in his ability to either sneak or run away, intimidate any pain-in-the-rear innocent by-standers, or fight his way out if necessary?

    Leave a comment:


  • D.B.Wagstaff
    replied
    I have absolutely no eidence upon which to base this half-baked speculation, but here is a thought:

    We know "Jack", or whatever his real name was, was good with a knife, and there seems to be some indications he was physically capable of disabling his victims - choking them unconscious, and possibly a blow to the head.

    We know he took some risks, including carrying out his crimes in places where he could have been discovered or cornered.

    Maybe Jack was a tough guy who knew how to handle himself and was pretty confident in his ability to either sneak or run away, intimidate any pain-in-the-rear innocent by-standers, or fight his way out if necessary?

    Leave a comment:


  • Malcolm X
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello David. Wrong? No, I would have assumed the same.

    Think she was there to meet someone.

    Cheers.
    LC
    yes, to meet someone she knew from Dutfields, but still as a prostitute... i think

    it is clearly obvious that she was waiting there for someone inside, because she was still there after being attacked earlier on

    Leave a comment:


  • Wickerman
    replied
    Originally posted by DVV View Post
    ???
    If that is your reply to my "organised opportunist" post, then I tell you the killer is obviously an organised opportunist. It's all in "Crime Scenes and MO for Dummies", my dear.
    See, I seem to recall we had identified traits in these crimes that suggested the killer was disorganized in some respects yet organised in others.
    In other words, he was no different than any of us....

    Perhaps thats the scary bit...

    Regards, Jon S.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Now I'm not saying Isenchmid couldn't be organised. Quite the reverse, remembering his capability to collect, prepare and sell succulent têtes de veau sauce gribiche.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello (again) David. Why is that?

    Cheers.
    LC
    ???
    If that is your reply to my "organised opportunist" post, then I tell you the killer is obviously an organised opportunist. It's all in "Crime Scenes and MO for Dummies", my dear.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Think she was there to meet someone.
    LC
    Indeed. That's what all prostitutes at work are out for.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    por que?

    Hello (again) David. Why is that?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    assumption

    Hello David. Wrong? No, I would have assumed the same.

    Think she was there to meet someone.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    If the killer were disorganised, he likely would not have lasted through 5 murders. In fact, I think he would have been apprehended, by, say, September 12.
    Cheers.
    LC
    Problem is that the man who murdered Nichols and Chapman wasn't a disorganised killer. He was an organised opportunist.

    Leave a comment:


  • DVV
    replied
    So what you think, Lynn ?
    Police were all wrong, she wasn't a prostitute and she was out in Berner Street after midnight for a cachous tasting ?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    "Don't be sad, two out of three ain't bad."

    Hello David.

    1. "the IWMEC was in Berner Street"

    Quite.

    2. "prostitutes did solicit in Berner Street"

    I presume. But certainly unlikely that ALL of Berner st were chaste. So, tentatively agree.

    3. "Stride, a known prostitute, was in Berner Street after midnight."

    Well, she was there after midnight. Known prostitute? Well, when she was in Sweden. And also assumed so by the police. That night? Ahem.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X