Hello all,
I am posting this poll as it is a interesting area of debate(which doesn't get debated too much).
I am posing the question of weather Jack the Ripper was really Jill the Ripper or not.
I am also posing the question, if you think it was "Jill the Ripper" who do you think it was?
My opinion
Whoever has read any of my posts knows I am big on the psychological aspect of a crime, more particularly on the one who performed the crime.
I have profiled Jack the Ripper many times, each time editing what seemed to be a error. There truly is not enough evidence in this case to provide a full profile. Here is what I have so far.
White
Male
Aged between 28 and 36
Local whitechapel or spitalfields resident
Weekly employed
Eccentric in his behavior
Neat and organised( in his daily life, not meaning he was a fully organised killer)
Outgoing, very socialy acceptable indavidual
May or may not have been incarcerated between Sep 31 and Nov 8.
May perhaps shows some Narcissistic qualities
Not married
Never sired a child
This is very scepticle, I am sure I will get many replies trying to discredit this, but it is what we have. It cannot be seen as accurate(or at least fully accurate, it may very well be right on(Wouldn't that be 'somethin'? )) because we don't know when he first killed or when he stopped. It may have been well before Nichols(it was, he killed Tabram ) and it may have been well after Kelly(no comment ).
We don't even agree on weather he was a serial killer or not(he was, don't let them fool you).
However, we can all agree on this, the fact that he is a Lust murderer(using the generic definition, nothing to do with sexual acts.) and that he picks women victims indicate that he is indeed male. This IS at LEAST 99% accurate.
Yours truly
I am posting this poll as it is a interesting area of debate(which doesn't get debated too much).
I am posing the question of weather Jack the Ripper was really Jill the Ripper or not.
I am also posing the question, if you think it was "Jill the Ripper" who do you think it was?
My opinion
Whoever has read any of my posts knows I am big on the psychological aspect of a crime, more particularly on the one who performed the crime.
I have profiled Jack the Ripper many times, each time editing what seemed to be a error. There truly is not enough evidence in this case to provide a full profile. Here is what I have so far.
White
Male
Aged between 28 and 36
Local whitechapel or spitalfields resident
Weekly employed
Eccentric in his behavior
Neat and organised( in his daily life, not meaning he was a fully organised killer)
Outgoing, very socialy acceptable indavidual
May or may not have been incarcerated between Sep 31 and Nov 8.
May perhaps shows some Narcissistic qualities
Not married
Never sired a child
This is very scepticle, I am sure I will get many replies trying to discredit this, but it is what we have. It cannot be seen as accurate(or at least fully accurate, it may very well be right on(Wouldn't that be 'somethin'? )) because we don't know when he first killed or when he stopped. It may have been well before Nichols(it was, he killed Tabram ) and it may have been well after Kelly(no comment ).
We don't even agree on weather he was a serial killer or not(he was, don't let them fool you).
However, we can all agree on this, the fact that he is a Lust murderer(using the generic definition, nothing to do with sexual acts.) and that he picks women victims indicate that he is indeed male. This IS at LEAST 99% accurate.
Yours truly
Comment