One should only challenge Hutchinson's statement,if one can show contradictory evidence of another person being there.There is no such evidence available.Lewis states only one person stood near the court as she entered at 2.30,and there has never been evidence to contradict her statement.It is not sufficient,in these circumstances,to say it could have been someone else,or it could have been another time,it has to be shown that it was,and this has not been done.Hutchinson and Lewis had identified themselves by name to the authorities as being present or adjacent to Millers court at 2.30am on the morning of the 9th,and were believed.Had there been evidence to the contrary,it would have been made known.
In the case of Maxwell,there was contradictory medical evidence as to whether it could have been Kelly she saw.There is a difference.
In the case of Maxwell,there was contradictory medical evidence as to whether it could have been Kelly she saw.There is a difference.
Comment