Originally posted by Ben
View Post
It is getting a bit tiresome. But I have patience, so I will once more tell you that my own take on the affair is that is seemingly is one of paid-for sex.
But that is not the issue here. Naïvety is always a consequence of not having taken in or realized the full picture. And that is where you lack, Ben.
I am not saying that Astrakhan man probably was Kelly´s fiancée.
I am saying that it cannot be excluded as a possibility.
The whole issue at hand is the question "Do we have proof that Astrakhan man offered Kelly money for sex?"
That question cannot be swept away by jestering. It calls for an answer.
So drop all the ridiculing, drop the sarcasms and all that stuff, and answer the very simple question:
Do we have proof that money was offered by Astrakhan man in exchange for sex?
And don´t tell me it´s bleeding obvious that he did, that is NOT the issue. The only issue is whether we have proof that he did so.
Answer that question truthfully with either a "yes" or a "no". And if you choose the "yes" option, provide the proof.
All the best,
Fisherman
Comment