Carrying on from yesterday...
Likewise then, if the 'authorities' were the police, and they had admitted to the press that they no longer found Hutch and his story credible, because they were still asking themselves (??) why he had not come forward until after the inquest, this should have appeared somewhere in the police files. The fact that no such detail appears must mean (in your world) that no such admission was made by the police to the press. As usual, the press made it up - possibly as a result of fishing and getting a negative response re the importance of Hutch's sighting, which they misinterpreted.
...in which case Hutch would have described Blotchy - a genuine person of interest, with his own distinguishing features - blotchy skin and red whiskers - who would then be the 'last man in' according to Cox, and confirmed by Hutch. Blotchy was already in a brown trouser position, and if he had subsequently been found and questioned, possibly as a result of Hutch going round with the police to look for him, he could have earned himself brownie points if not a reward, and his account would not have been discredited later, no matter what. Blotchy would have been the one with all the explaining to do.
Love,
Caz
X
Originally posted by Ben
View Post
Garry Wroe has made the sensible suggestion that he may have been waiting for the Blotchy man to emerge from the Court...
Love,
Caz
X
Comment