Hutchinson's statement is not only riddled with faults ( his description of following Kelly) but it's also way too accurate in his description of the suspect, it's farcical for that time of night/ darkness/ drizzly rain etc etc... this has been discused so many times.
but there's something else far more subtle:- it's a very intense statement... he's really laying the blame on this suspect... painting him as a ``stereotypical theatrical bogeyman``...almost like the ``phantom of the opera``..or a ``Jeckyl and Hyde`` type...............sorry for my simplicity, but you know what i mean.... his statement is simply too loaded with suspicion... especially carrying the packet in his hand ``American cloth `` etc....no way, not that late at night, it's way too dark...
he's describing not a LA DE DA Jew.... but an evil person..it's like a gothic nightmare... ``he didn't look like somebody that could harm another man..plus he had a sullen look``.... Hutchinson is playing games with you, getting inside your head and it worked too...especially with the newspapers
there's something else not right in his statement that goes way beyond this... my guess is; he was the man seen outside Millers court and this spooked him.... does military in appearence mean... fit looking, strong and burly..or ``standing there dead still on guard duty...stalking``
Hutchinson was out late at night ( returning from Romford)... yea' sure
although the signatures match, this Hutchinson could still be the Ripper
you see, he messed up his description of following KELLY, got the pub name wrong etc etc, but this doesn't make sense from somebody that's supposedly so observant of his suspect..........i thus conclude:- he didn't see Kelly that night out on the streets, she didn't go out again.
or he lied about everything...but something tells me he was there.....because he came forward way too late, he would've gone to the police the next day... even if he was an attention seeker.... no no no, he went to the inquest to find out if anybody had seen him stalking outside MILLERS COURT, they had; so he went strait to the police
but there's something else far more subtle:- it's a very intense statement... he's really laying the blame on this suspect... painting him as a ``stereotypical theatrical bogeyman``...almost like the ``phantom of the opera``..or a ``Jeckyl and Hyde`` type...............sorry for my simplicity, but you know what i mean.... his statement is simply too loaded with suspicion... especially carrying the packet in his hand ``American cloth `` etc....no way, not that late at night, it's way too dark...
he's describing not a LA DE DA Jew.... but an evil person..it's like a gothic nightmare... ``he didn't look like somebody that could harm another man..plus he had a sullen look``.... Hutchinson is playing games with you, getting inside your head and it worked too...especially with the newspapers
there's something else not right in his statement that goes way beyond this... my guess is; he was the man seen outside Millers court and this spooked him.... does military in appearence mean... fit looking, strong and burly..or ``standing there dead still on guard duty...stalking``
Hutchinson was out late at night ( returning from Romford)... yea' sure
although the signatures match, this Hutchinson could still be the Ripper
you see, he messed up his description of following KELLY, got the pub name wrong etc etc, but this doesn't make sense from somebody that's supposedly so observant of his suspect..........i thus conclude:- he didn't see Kelly that night out on the streets, she didn't go out again.
or he lied about everything...but something tells me he was there.....because he came forward way too late, he would've gone to the police the next day... even if he was an attention seeker.... no no no, he went to the inquest to find out if anybody had seen him stalking outside MILLERS COURT, they had; so he went strait to the police
Comment