There are lots of references, especially in the older(ish) books to people who knew, or thought they knew who the killer was, so why did they not go to the police with information? If the killer was attached to one of the many vicious criminal gangs which have flourished in the East End since the Middle Ages, when it was called Alsatia, up until the Krays and beyond, perhaps people knew but were too afraid of what the gangs would do to them and their families if they went to the police. Or did they suspect someone from the "ruling classes" and feel that it was hopeless to try to stop them.
It seems to me that living as closely as they did, they must have had some idea of who was responsible. Relations with the police were not of the best. I had a friend who was a district nurse in the area in the 1960s and she often said that she heard things but going to the police would effectively prevent her from continuing with her job, which was an important one for the health of the mothers and children she cared for. There is a long tradition of keeping silent. Would this have hindered the police in their efforts?
Best wishes
C4
It seems to me that living as closely as they did, they must have had some idea of who was responsible. Relations with the police were not of the best. I had a friend who was a district nurse in the area in the 1960s and she often said that she heard things but going to the police would effectively prevent her from continuing with her job, which was an important one for the health of the mothers and children she cared for. There is a long tradition of keeping silent. Would this have hindered the police in their efforts?
Best wishes
C4
Comment