lacking
Hello Trevor. Thanks.
If you are contending that it was no doctor, then you are preaching to the choir. My point of departure is that Polly and Annie exhibited certain commonalities which Kate did not. As a detective yourself, I'm sure you recognise the import.
Cheers.
LC
If a doctor was responsible for the murders.......................
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostShe was--when in SWEDEN.
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostYes. You THINK.
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostYou mean REASONING? Please be aware that LOGIC is the STUDY of reasoning.
noun
1.
reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostFaulty? To be sure. I tried to match YOUR reasoning so you could understand where you had gone astray.
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostAm I to understand that time was NOT of the essence on the open street (Buck's Row) and under the windows of #29 Hanbury? Yet knife skill was shown there.
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostFor your next point, 5 murders, two on the same day, and three different days of the week. What's the pattern in that?
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostFinally, if we are accomplishing nothing, why don't we break off?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello EWC. Thanks.
I am merely stressing what the medical people/coroner had to say. If they were mistaken, then so am I.
Cheers.
LC
This suggestion of a doctor has misled the public and researchers for god knows how many years and why? Simply because of the picture of a man in a black hat, wearing a black cape and carrying a Gladstone bag. which appears on most ripper books and in documentaries and is suggestive of that person being a doctor. Add to that the now defunked organ removal theory we get doctor, doctor and doctor !
The public have been brainwashed, besides if a doctor wanted organs he could obtain them much more easily than ripping open womens abdomens in the dead of night.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Lynn
Hello Tracy. By Jove, that's it! Well spotted.
Tracy
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Abby Normal View PostHi Lc
Martha Tabram killed Aug 7
Polly Nichols Aug 31
Chapman Sep 8
Stride/eddowes. Sep 30
Kelly Nov 9
Do you see a pattern?
The best,
Fisherman
Leave a comment:
-
pisteo
Hello EWC. Thanks.
One may "believe" (I think that was your word) whatever one wishes. But I still prefer evidence.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
cracking the code
Hello Tracy. By Jove, that's it! Well spotted.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
composite numbers
Hello Abby. Thanks.
No, I must confess I do not. But, if you can tell me what 7, 9, 30 and so on have in common, I'd be pleased to listen. I notice that all these are composite EXCEPT 7, which is prime.
Something like that?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello EWC. Thanks.
I am merely stressing what the medical people/coroner had to say. If they were mistaken, then so am I.
Cheers.
LC
As I do subscribe to Liz being in that group, I believe our killer was incensed after not being able to carry out all of his desires and also very aware of the possible increasing police presence in the area following the discovery of Liz in the yard. This goes some way in understanding the ferocity and haste in which he dealt with Eddowes, which is why I find your comparison to Polly not as relevant as you and others perhaps do.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello Harry. Thanks.
"Stride was a known casual prostitute, she was hanging around outside a social club at night, and was believed to be soliciting that night by Swanson & the police. She was found murdered in a secluded yard, just the kind of location a prostitute would take a client."
She was--when in SWEDEN.
"And probably short of a few bob. How would she remedy that, me thinks?"
Yes. You THINK.
"Faulty logic (and the same goes for your assassinated presidents)."
You mean REASONING? Please be aware that LOGIC is the STUDY of reasoning.
Faulty? To be sure. I tried to match YOUR reasoning so you could understand where you had gone astray.
"As time was of the essence, I think this would be reflected in his work, wouldn't you?"
Am I to understand that time was NOT of the essence on the open street (Buck's Row) and under the windows of #29 Hanbury? Yet knife skill was shown there.
For your next point, 5 murders, two on the same day, and three different days of the week. What's the pattern in that?
Finally, if we are accomplishing nothing, why don't we break off?
Cheers.
LC
Martha Tabram killed Aug 7
Polly Nichols Aug 31
Chapman Sep 8
Stride/eddowes. Sep 30
Kelly Nov 9
Do you see a pattern?
Leave a comment:
-
coroner
Hello EWC. Thanks.
I am merely stressing what the medical people/coroner had to say. If they were mistaken, then so am I.
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by lynn cates View PostHello EWC. Thanks.
"but just how tidy could one be with such a meagre time window and in the almost total darkness of Mitre Square?"
Don't know. But just how tidy could one be with such a meagre time window and in the almost total darkness of Buck's Row?
Cheers.
LC
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: