If a doctor was responsible for the murders.......................

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • lynn cates
    replied
    lacking

    Hello Trevor. Thanks.

    If you are contending that it was no doctor, then you are preaching to the choir. My point of departure is that Polly and Annie exhibited certain commonalities which Kate did not. As a detective yourself, I'm sure you recognise the import.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    deferential

    Hello Tracy. Thanks.

    I defer to you.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Harry D
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    She was--when in SWEDEN.
    What do you think she was doing in the yard?

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Yes. You THINK.
    Stands to reason. Speaking of...

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    You mean REASONING? Please be aware that LOGIC is the STUDY of reasoning.
    logic
    noun
    1.
    reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity.


    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Faulty? To be sure. I tried to match YOUR reasoning so you could understand where you had gone astray.
    You were making false analogies, that's what you were doing.

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Am I to understand that time was NOT of the essence on the open street (Buck's Row) and under the windows of #29 Hanbury? Yet knife skill was shown there.
    We KNOW that the killer had a narrow window of opportunity with Eddowes, we don't know this was the same for Nichols or Chapman, do we?

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    For your next point, 5 murders, two on the same day, and three different days of the week. What's the pattern in that?
    All five murders occurred at the weekend or the day before. That means, in your book, you've got multiple killers all with a similar schedule?

    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Finally, if we are accomplishing nothing, why don't we break off?
    That's fair enough, I don't have the patience for protracted internet debates these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Originally posted by tji View Post
    Hi Lynn



    I don't like to brag, but I think I cracked it there.

    Tracy
    If you´ve got it, flaunt it, Tracy!

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • Trevor Marriott
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello EWC. Thanks.

    I am merely stressing what the medical people/coroner had to say. If they were mistaken, then so am I.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hi Lynn
    This suggestion of a doctor has misled the public and researchers for god knows how many years and why? Simply because of the picture of a man in a black hat, wearing a black cape and carrying a Gladstone bag. which appears on most ripper books and in documentaries and is suggestive of that person being a doctor. Add to that the now defunked organ removal theory we get doctor, doctor and doctor !

    The public have been brainwashed, besides if a doctor wanted organs he could obtain them much more easily than ripping open womens abdomens in the dead of night.

    Leave a comment:


  • tji
    replied
    Hi Lynn

    Hello Tracy. By Jove, that's it! Well spotted.
    I don't like to brag, but I think I cracked it there.

    Tracy

    Leave a comment:


  • Fisherman
    replied
    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi Lc

    Martha Tabram killed Aug 7
    Polly Nichols Aug 31
    Chapman Sep 8
    Stride/eddowes. Sep 30
    Kelly Nov 9

    Do you see a pattern?
    Would you expect the next murder to appear on the 29:th of November, is that it, Abby? If so, I am not sure that the killer was a number mysticist...

    The best,
    Fisherman

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    pisteo

    Hello EWC. Thanks.

    One may "believe" (I think that was your word) whatever one wishes. But I still prefer evidence.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    cracking the code

    Hello Tracy. By Jove, that's it! Well spotted.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    composite numbers

    Hello Abby. Thanks.

    No, I must confess I do not. But, if you can tell me what 7, 9, 30 and so on have in common, I'd be pleased to listen. I notice that all these are composite EXCEPT 7, which is prime.

    Something like that?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • El White Chap
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello EWC. Thanks.

    I am merely stressing what the medical people/coroner had to say. If they were mistaken, then so am I.

    Cheers.
    LC
    The murderers frustrating shortcomings with Stride (i.e. no mutilations) could have been a motive for the more aggressive wounds and "sloppiness" with Eddowes. That is of course if you subscribe to Stride being a victim by the same hand as at least Annie and Kate, which you appear not to do.

    As I do subscribe to Liz being in that group, I believe our killer was incensed after not being able to carry out all of his desires and also very aware of the possible increasing police presence in the area following the discovery of Liz in the yard. This goes some way in understanding the ferocity and haste in which he dealt with Eddowes, which is why I find your comparison to Polly not as relevant as you and others perhaps do.

    Leave a comment:


  • tji
    replied
    Hi Abby

    Originally posted by Abby Normal View Post
    Hi Lc

    Martha Tabram killed Aug 7
    Polly Nichols Aug 31
    Chapman Sep 8
    Stride/eddowes. Sep 30
    Kelly Nov 9

    Do you see a pattern?

    I see it now - the days they all died had numbers in them

    Leave a comment:


  • Abby Normal
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello Harry. Thanks.

    "Stride was a known casual prostitute, she was hanging around outside a social club at night, and was believed to be soliciting that night by Swanson & the police. She was found murdered in a secluded yard, just the kind of location a prostitute would take a client."

    She was--when in SWEDEN.

    "And probably short of a few bob. How would she remedy that, me thinks?"

    Yes. You THINK.

    "Faulty logic (and the same goes for your assassinated presidents)."

    You mean REASONING? Please be aware that LOGIC is the STUDY of reasoning.

    Faulty? To be sure. I tried to match YOUR reasoning so you could understand where you had gone astray.

    "As time was of the essence, I think this would be reflected in his work, wouldn't you?"

    Am I to understand that time was NOT of the essence on the open street (Buck's Row) and under the windows of #29 Hanbury? Yet knife skill was shown there.

    For your next point, 5 murders, two on the same day, and three different days of the week. What's the pattern in that?

    Finally, if we are accomplishing nothing, why don't we break off?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Hi Lc

    Martha Tabram killed Aug 7
    Polly Nichols Aug 31
    Chapman Sep 8
    Stride/eddowes. Sep 30
    Kelly Nov 9

    Do you see a pattern?

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    coroner

    Hello EWC. Thanks.

    I am merely stressing what the medical people/coroner had to say. If they were mistaken, then so am I.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • El White Chap
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    Hello EWC. Thanks.

    "but just how tidy could one be with such a meagre time window and in the almost total darkness of Mitre Square?"

    Don't know. But just how tidy could one be with such a meagre time window and in the almost total darkness of Buck's Row?

    Cheers.
    LC
    Touché. So, are you suggesting that Polly's wounds were much "tidier"?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X