Originally posted by lynn cates
View Post
I don't buy any scenario in which Jack was killing these women because he was Jewish. There is absolutely nothing in our teachings, laws, superstitions, etc. that could remotely support his actions. Another problem is that Judaism is not easy, and there aren't a lot of answers to be had. Unstable people need more than the litany of "maybes" that goes along with the faith. So unstable people tend not to be practicing Jews.
And of course since we have the rare distinction of being considered both a religion and a race, it is very easy for Jews to be atheists. I know any number of practicing Jews who are atheists. Any practicing Jew whether they believe in god or not is unlikely to be a serial killer. Not even because it goes against the faith, but because we are pretty comfortable with both black and white issues and grey areas. We are told what to do. Very black and white, no room for argument. But we are never told what we get out of it. Very grey.
And since Jews as a race tend to value academia and arts above anything else, we do have a certain amount of discipline drummed into us, and socially acceptable outlets for emotions available to us.
That being said, there are more Jewish serial killers than there should be. We represent far less than 1% of the population, but make up I think 8% of serial killers. And I can't find any practicing Jewish serial killers, but there have been two or three practicing Jews I think would have been serial killers if they hadn't gotten caught their first time out. So there is something about us that lends itself to serial killing. We still don't even remotely represent the majority of serial killers, but we are over represented. Jewish serial killers tend to be adopted, for what it's worth. They also have a tendency for dismemberment, but not always. Adoption is kind of rough in Jewish culture. It's certainly not frowned on or anything, but the religion really emphasis blood ties, which adopted kids don't have. It's isolating. As for the dismemberment thing, I have no idea. It's usually for disposal or eating, but I can't think of anything I've ever experienced in Judaism that would make me prefer dismemberment over just rolling up someone in a rug and tossing them off a bridge.
Jack might have been Jewish. But he wasn't killing because of his religion or ethnic background. I tend to think he wasn't, because this was clearly a guy who not just blended in, but didn't look suspicious. Jews at the time were viewed with at least mild suspicion. They were different, and weird, and kept to themselves. Like today, he couldn't be Amish because we notice Amish people immediately. And likely he couldn't be Muslim because many people are mildly suspicious of Muslims. If these murders happened in modern New York, every possible witness would have mentioned a Middle Easterner if one was on the scene. Its not so dissimilar to Jews in 1888. They were still different enough to stand out in people's minds. Now a third generation blond, green eyed Polish secular Jew might not stand out at all. But at that point, there's no point in him even being Jewish, because no one would have described him as a Jew.
Comment