Evidence to prove a suspect valid

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DRoy
    replied
    Originally posted by c.d. View Post
    There are knife murders and then there are knife murders.
    And there are copycat knife murders.

    Cheers
    DRoy

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Digalittledeeperwatson

    You forgot to add [in my opinion at least] the opinions of those on the ground that saw the crime scene and examined the body.

    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • Digalittledeeperwatson
    replied
    Hullo all.

    It is important to incorporate all the data. So, where Stride's injuries don't "match" other potential "JTR" victims, it should be kept in mind the scene where she was killed. Dark spot, body positioning to wall, a location good for discovery, etc. There are other simlarities to consider. I am not pro or anti Stride inclusion. There are more things to consider than just knife wounds to throats and abdomens. There are many conflictions as it pertains to Berner Street, so it boils down to what one chooses to support. Only things we really have are small amounts of forensic evidence. Wounds, body positioning, stupid f*****g cachous. "JTR"? 50/50 chance seems fair enough.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    comparisons

    Hello Errata. Thanks.

    Indeed--comparisons should be at a premium.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • Errata
    replied
    Originally posted by lynn cates View Post
    "why are we equating ANY knife murder of a woman to one where the woman was a prostitute and had her throat cut and her internal organs removed and there was no known motive?"

    Umm, because that is how the question was posed. If you wish to eliminate those without organ removal, voila, there go Polly and Liz.

    Cheers.
    LC
    Why are we equating the cut throat murder of a woman with no mutilation with the murder of a woman that same night who looked like she got run over by a lawnmower?

    Strides murder more closely resembles that of poor Hannah Potzdamer than Catherine Eddowes. Maybe Mr. Potzdamer did a trial run on some random woman before going after his wife.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    almost makes sense

    Hello CD. Thanks.

    I know one or two. Frankly, it almost makes sense. Something bad happens, a lass is killed. Jack did it.

    Why not?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • c.d.
    replied
    Hello Lynn,

    You seem to be expending a lot of energy trying to knock down an argument that is not being made nor has it ever been made. I am not aware of anyone claiming that Jack was responsible for every single murder in Whitechapel.

    c.d.

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    failure

    Hello GUT. Thanks.

    Aspirin failure?

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    identified

    Hello Tom. Thanks.

    "Well, there was a police officer who identified her as a prostitute."

    Indeed. And another copper claimed Piser was "Leather Apron."

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    removal

    Hello CD. Thanks.

    "And just for the record, I have never been aware that anyone who believes Jack killed the C5 has ever stated that he killed every single woman in Whitechapel."

    Actually, I'd like it better if you did. makes MUCH more sense than the current enumeration system.

    "why are we equating ANY knife murder of a woman to one where the woman was a prostitute and had her throat cut and her internal organs removed and there was no known motive?"

    Umm, because that is how the question was posed. If you wish to eliminate those without organ removal, voila, there go Polly and Liz.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day LC

    Same thing mum always told my sisters.
    Till big sis tried to prove her wrong.


    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • lynn cates
    replied
    aspirin

    Hello Errata. Thanks.

    Precisely.

    Incidentally, a colleague informed me that here is one birth control drug that
    is 100% effective and contained in most households. Aspirin. She told me that taking one tablet and holding it between the knees always works.

    Cheers.
    LC

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day c.d.

    Please don't say things like that. The anti-Jack crowd will pick up on it and use it in their posts when they want to be smart ass and sarcastic.
    Sorry my bad

    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • GUT
    replied
    G'Day Tom

    Thank you thank you thank you I had to look up gesundheit!


    GUT

    Leave a comment:


  • Tom_Wescott
    replied
    Originally posted by GUT View Post
    G'Day Tom and Errata

    Gimme a break I barely speak English now I've gotta master Latin and German.

    GUT
    You're safe, Gut. I exhausted my German in that first post. I'm hanging my hat on the hope she doesn't break out the Latin again until I can get Rosetta Stone.

    Yours truly,

    Tom Wescott

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X