Originally posted by Phil H
View Post
I will not rule out the killer of C1 and C2 from attacking any of the other victims, because there is no good evidence to do so. I have yet to see any good reason to clear this man of suspicion and put x number of complete unknowns in his place. Surely that makes me a lot less closed minded than those who argue - from sheer gut instinct and personal distaste for 'conventional wisdom' - that this man didn't, or couldn't have killed this or that victim. They toss out the conventional wisdom because it has failed to hand us a solution - as if that would be remotely odd in the circumstances - and they suppose that their new wisdom must serve us better.
My mind is open to all potentialities and possibilities.
Love,
Caz
X
Comment