What was Kosminski is now Lechmere: how relevant is Scobie?

[Geddy2112]

The suggestion that Scobie was in any way misled is in itself therefore the only misleading there is.

Sorry not the best freeze frame but if you watch the Missing Evidence the video shows the document (in the picture) that Scobie is reading from. The 'about' has clearly been omitted, like it was a couple of times from Cutting Point, like it was from the Swedish Newspaper, The Telegraph and the Wales Online articles etc etc etc. It seems the only pattern of offending here is by Holmgren himself.

It is highly unlikely that there will ever be the definitive proof to convict anyone suspect but James Scobie suggests the evidence drawn together by Christer [Holmgren] could take Charles Lechmere to a murder trial.

So according to the documentary the evidence supplied to Scobie was in fact complied by Holmgren. The evidence is not factually correct as shown in the freeze frame and the author Holmgren has 'form' is 'forgetting' to put the 'about' into the equation on numerous occasions. So is the documentary actually suggesting Holmgren lied to Scobie to get the result he wanted, after all the timings really hurt him, it's a shame those timings are not strictly true. So either the Documentary is lying or.... well make your own mind up. I have.