Originally posted by DVV
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Let's narrow down some Ripper 'facts'
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by DVV View PostAccording to Bond's own words, and here is your problem.
Please answer : why do you think Bond's ToD is accurate ?
Warren & Anderson trusted Bond, irrefutably it seems.
It didn't need to be accurate by our standards, his opinion needs to be trusted by them.
They made the decisions, not I.
Regards, Jon S.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostAre you intentionally avoiding the real point?
Warren & Anderson trusted Bond, irrefutably it seems.
It didn't need to be accurate by our standards, his opinion needs to be trusted by them.
They made the decisions, not I.
Regards, Jon S.
Unfortunately, it's useless.
You may like to have the last word for the sake of it, as for me, it's no problem when I'm corrected.
Comment
-
-
Oh, what's this ?
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostActually Malcolm, I was thinking of something a little more specific:
“The body was comparatively cold at 2 o'clock........It is therefore pretty certain that the woman must have been dead about 12 hours and the partly digested food would indicate: that death took place about 3 or 4 hours after the food was taken, so one or two o'clock in the morning would be the probable time of her murder”
So long as Anderson puts faith in Bond's opinion, both Swanson and Abberline have little room for manouver. Hutchinson claiming to see Kelly when she was already dead (Bond), means they must relegate Hutchinson's claim in favour of Cox's.
What do they have to enable them to argue with the boss? - nothing.
They already have one case of mistaken identity in Maxwell, so now they have another in Hutchinson?
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
And this...
Originally posted by Wickerman View Post
Anderson asked Bond for his opinion, Bond sent it in writing on the 10th so Anderson had in his hands Kelly's probable time of death.
- What do you think he would do with it?
- What impact would this have on the course of the investigation?
- Any point in pursuing Hutchinson's suspect any more?
Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
And this...
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostGiven that Cox could only provide a suspect 1 hour and 15 minutes before Bond's probable "time of death" estimate, Anderson will know that Lawende is still a better witness from a legal perspective.
Bond's medical estimate does not make Cox a principal witness for sighting the Ripper, what it does do is eliminate Hutchinson from ever being considered as "the best witness", in spite of his claim.
Regards, Jon s.
And you're just a liar, and too proud to admit you're wrong.
Comment
-
Agreed, now kindly show me what is written "essentially in my reasoning"?
Then, please explain why what I think about Bond's estimate has anything to do with Anderson's decision.
Lastly, unless you missed it, I also pointed out to Malcolm that Bond's estimate need not have been correct. The fact it was trusted and accepted by those who matter, is all that is relevant for the change to occur.
Unless you think otherwise.
Regards, Jon S.Regards, Jon S.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Wickerman View PostUnless you think otherwise.
Regards, Jon S.
As much as all of us.
In other (broken-English) terms : Anderson knew that Bond had no idea when Mary took her last meal.
Comment
Comment