I am well aware of what was reported.My point is,that the P.C' called to assist Long,would have had no knowledge of how Long obtained the apron piece.Therefor Long's testimony is uncororborated.
Same with Brown.He stated he matched two pieces of apron.There is no testimony of how this was done,when it was done,or if there were witnesses present.His evidence is uncororberated.
Now both Long and Brown may be telling the truth,but please do not try to force it down my throat that because they gave evidence under oath they must be telling the truth.I spent too long in law enforcement to fall for that explanation.
If posters are willing to believe or theorise that there is supporting evidence that puts Long's and Brown's testimony beyond doubt,they are welcome to it,but at this time I side with Trevor.There isreason to be cautious as to the truth being known.
Same with Brown.He stated he matched two pieces of apron.There is no testimony of how this was done,when it was done,or if there were witnesses present.His evidence is uncororberated.
Now both Long and Brown may be telling the truth,but please do not try to force it down my throat that because they gave evidence under oath they must be telling the truth.I spent too long in law enforcement to fall for that explanation.
If posters are willing to believe or theorise that there is supporting evidence that puts Long's and Brown's testimony beyond doubt,they are welcome to it,but at this time I side with Trevor.There isreason to be cautious as to the truth being known.
Comment