Hello Jen,
I dont really see your argument here. The reasons for Packer being discounted by the police cannot be compared with Hutchinson because there is not a statement for Hutchinson being discounted. That is the whole point.
If there was then you could compare them.
The real point is that Packer gave a statement and then there is a report that it is disbelieved. That is normal police procedure.
The only thing we have with Hutchinson is that he gave a statement and it was believed. Nothing has been produced from the police that they changed their stance on that.
Although it has been said that the information contained within the two press reports came from the police there has been nothing produced to substantiate that.
Therefore, the arguement that Hutchinson was discredited by the police is completely unverified.
Best wishes.
David
I dont really see your argument here. The reasons for Packer being discounted by the police cannot be compared with Hutchinson because there is not a statement for Hutchinson being discounted. That is the whole point.
If there was then you could compare them.
The real point is that Packer gave a statement and then there is a report that it is disbelieved. That is normal police procedure.
The only thing we have with Hutchinson is that he gave a statement and it was believed. Nothing has been produced from the police that they changed their stance on that.
Although it has been said that the information contained within the two press reports came from the police there has been nothing produced to substantiate that.
Therefore, the arguement that Hutchinson was discredited by the police is completely unverified.
Best wishes.
David
Comment