Originally posted by Robert
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Favorite suspect/s?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Elamarna View PostGiven her wounds i would suggest blood would start to clott within 10 minutes of the attack, however we must remember that she was disturbed by Paul and Lechmere, before Neil arrived, such could start blood to ooze again..
At first sight, i saw it as a real possability of setting a time of attack, but its not.
I would suggest, no more, that the attack took place approx 10 minutes max before Paul arrived, but its guess work, the tools to be more pricise do not exist now and certainly did not in 1888.
And of course if Fish is correct that the abdomen wounds were first and the cause of death (which they could be, but inconsider highly unlikely) then the whole game would change even if the hypothesis worked, which is doesn't.
Steve
Did people bleed longer in 1888?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Jon Guy View PostMe neither.
The fact is Mizen stumbled onto the two of them leaving Bucks Row together.
disagree with that wording-they approached him. even Mizen says that."Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kaz View PostJust out of interest, herlock, why do you sit on the fence with the Diary and yet Lechmere is a complete non-starter, someone who shouldn't even be considered?"Is all that we see or seem
but a dream within a dream?"
-Edgar Allan Poe
"...the man and the peaked cap he is said to have worn
quite tallies with the descriptions I got of him."
-Frederick G. Abberline
Comment
-
"We wouldn´t know, Robert. It´s a wee hard to tell. You are not weeing on me, are you?"
Could you repeat that, Fish? I'm way down Hanbury St out of earshot. Of course, mystically I'm still with Crossmere and Mizen, but there you are - the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Fisherman View PostYou must admit, though, that killing en route to work would provide him with an alibi if found close to a murder site. That seems clever to me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Robert View Post"We wouldn´t know, Robert. It´s a wee hard to tell. You are not weeing on me, are you?"
Could you repeat that, Fish? I'm way down Hanbury St out of earshot. Of course, mystically I'm still with Crossmere and Mizen, but there you are - the spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Jon Guy View PostSame difference, Abby, my point being that Mizen saw 2 men leaving (what we now know as the murder site) together.
I have said this before, and I will reiterate it: There is the possibility that Lechmere told Paul that he would fool any PC they met so they could slip past him and get to work faster. In such a case, Paul could/would have heard what was said, but would likely be reluctant to speak of it at the inquest.
However, I favour the option with Paul being out of earshot. Less risk involved.
Comment
-
Comment