I wonder if Mrs Lech ever got a bit suspicious about her husband being out at ridiculous times when he needed to be out of the house at 3.30 to get to work. For eg when he dumped the apron in the doorway of Goulston Street, having been out earlier to kill Stride (or maybe not?) it would have been around 2am. Did he then go home arriving at around 2.20ish only to have to get up an hour later? Or did he just stay out all night with Mrs Lech not complaining and old Charlie still fresh enough to put in a days graft?
Annie Chapman’s t.o.d might be debated....4.30/5.30? Both are still after the time that we would have expected CL to have been at work.
MJK, if we believe Hutch, was alive at 2am. So again we have CL out in the wee small hours about to commit a time-consuming and exhausting murder after which he would, in all likelihood, have had to have toddled straight off too work. Was Mrs Lech locked in a cupboard all night? Did she mind her husband bringing back bags of body parts in the early hours
Ok, I’m being a touch facetious here but the points stand. More doubts. Proper serious ones which Fish will simply brush aside. Surely it’s more likely that the ripper had more freedom than a man who had to be at work at 4am everyday to do a long and tiring shift? Surely it’s more likely that the ripper had somewhere private where he could keep his grisly trophies and not in the larder being the bread (sorry )
These are not conclusive signs of innocence but they are serious doubts to be added to a long list of serious doubts. Far, far too many for anyone to believe with any level of confidence that CL was the ripper.
Annie Chapman’s t.o.d might be debated....4.30/5.30? Both are still after the time that we would have expected CL to have been at work.
MJK, if we believe Hutch, was alive at 2am. So again we have CL out in the wee small hours about to commit a time-consuming and exhausting murder after which he would, in all likelihood, have had to have toddled straight off too work. Was Mrs Lech locked in a cupboard all night? Did she mind her husband bringing back bags of body parts in the early hours
Ok, I’m being a touch facetious here but the points stand. More doubts. Proper serious ones which Fish will simply brush aside. Surely it’s more likely that the ripper had more freedom than a man who had to be at work at 4am everyday to do a long and tiring shift? Surely it’s more likely that the ripper had somewhere private where he could keep his grisly trophies and not in the larder being the bread (sorry )
These are not conclusive signs of innocence but they are serious doubts to be added to a long list of serious doubts. Far, far too many for anyone to believe with any level of confidence that CL was the ripper.
Comment