Originally posted by elmore 77
View Post
Please allow me to introduce myself....
Collapse
X
-
Any medical man is interesting Dave,many fit with our ideas of the killer,they have the skills necessary.But unless Bond had an accomplice I think you're wrong.I know it's not obvious on the surface but Bond had some sort of breakdown in 1888 and began his killing spree in relation to anniversaries of the deaths of family members and the graveyard he was eventually buried in.
The 1888 murders are a spree within a series that also contains the Torsos and Elizabeth Camp.
Just to reiterate-in the most extreme terms used by the various parties involved-
The 'spy police' arrested the 'deviant women' and took them to the Lock Hospitals where they were subjected to the 'rape of the speculum'
Bond spent 8 years face down in the fannies of women he thought were scum.Some of them must have been physically attractive,he must have felt the odd twinge once or twice.A 'churchy' type might have been in deep conflict over that and may have blamed the women for his arousal.
Leave a comment:
-
Ironically,the son in law of my JtR suspect was appointed assistant medical officer at Bethlem around that time.By 1878 chief medical officer.Resigned 1888.Originally posted by elmore 77 View PostI just started reading an article which delineates prostitutes as working class women and 'fallen' women as middle class.The perception being that the 'fallen' had been seduced and abandoned,lost their social connections and fallen into poverty and vice.Bond's sister-in-law appears to have been heading down that path after her broken engagement prior to her admission to Bethlem in 1873 .
1871 saw another Westminster notable became the Baronet of Brook Street.
JtR was his protege.
Thomas Stevenson,toxicologist on four of the biggest cases of the era,was on the St Leonard Vestry Board with my suspect.
Small world.
Leave a comment:
-
A bit of text went missing so I've redone it.It's on page 4 and concerns the timing of the Camp murder,sorry about that.
Pierre,I'm sure he regarded them as pond life,so probably not worthy of anything at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe he did not want a uterus.Originally posted by elmore 77 View Post'William Acton and others believed it was women and not men that were the source of contagion for venereal disease.Prostitutes were defined as 'The Great
Social Evil'and as women who had a sexual impulse like men'
Prostitutes were obviously reviled in those days,killing them is not such a huge leap,but what sort of man wants a uterus?
Maybe he did think that these types of women were not worthy of having such.
Pierre
Leave a comment:
-
Last weekend I noticed some very interesting coincidences regarding timings which I've added in various locations,plus a few lines about Louisa Osborn at the foot of page 4
Leave a comment:
-
'William Acton and others believed it was women and not men that were the source of contagion for venereal disease.Prostitutes were defined as 'The Great
Social Evil'and as women who had a sexual impulse like men'
Prostitutes were obviously reviled in those days,killing them is not such a huge leap,but what sort of man wants a uterus?
Leave a comment:
-
I just started reading an article which delineates prostitutes as working class women and 'fallen' women as middle class.The perception being that the 'fallen' had been seduced and abandoned,lost their social connections and fallen into poverty and vice.Bond's sister-in-law appears to have been heading down that path after her broken engagement prior to her admission to Bethlem in 1873 .
Leave a comment:
-
I can't find it at present,but the other day I was reading an article on Lock Hospitals in which the author witnessed the surgeon examine 58 women in under 2 hours.Allowing for the probability that the Lock at the workhouse was a lot less busy than the London Lock Hospital,if we said Bond saw 58 women a week,50 weeks a year for 8 years,that's a total of 23,200 exams.Cervical discharge was the common symptom,personal hygiene was not a priority. As you can see from my previous post,he was no friend to these women,he judged them as the lowest form of life.Many would have resented being there,tears and tantrums would likely have been a daily occurence.
Bond was a clean freak as you'd hope a surgeon to be.But,he was also a god botherer and his job was treating people who had more often than not come to him through their own 'immorality'.He was probably heartily sick of seeing women leave after being cured only to show up again a week or two later with a fresh dose of the 'clap'.
If sex outside marriage was regarded as 'sinning',consider the attitude to women shagging in alleyways with allcomers and spreading potentially fatal diseases.
In calling them 'soldiers women' he not only denigrates them but also the soldiers.Considering he went to Prussia in the hope of witnessing battlefield surgery,the obvious conclusion is that he wasn't interested in helping the injured men,but just wanted to expand his experience of dreadful injuries.I wonder what his war hero sons and grandsons would think of that.
A question; If Bond held these women in such contempt,why did he stay in the job for 2 years after gaining his appointment at Westminster?
Leave a comment:
-
I wonder if you are addressing this to the right party Phil. I'm not the one who created this thread, nor have I done huge research about Dr. Bond (elmore did). However, to answer your question, I'd go 10% to 25% involvement based on what has been presented by elmore.Originally posted by Phil Carter View PostHi Jeff,
May I ask a question of you? Thanks ��
Having studied the antecedents of Bond to the level of that you have done..and ignoring all else..would you categorise the possibility of some sort of involvement in the WM at some stage in terms of percentages from your own perspective please?
Important to note.. when I say "involvement. .at some stage" Imean not in every murder..but as a participant in one or more.
0 % ...no participation at all.
0-10 % ... small possibility
10-25% ...small to fair possibility
25-50% ...fair to good possibility
50-75% ...good to very good possibility
75%+ .......very good +
In asking..I recall the watching and surveillance of the Birminham connection.. and have a thought towards another well known doctor I myself rate at 0-10% possibility
Many thanks
Phil
Jeff
Leave a comment:
-
On a T.V chatshow the other day,a clergyman stated that sex outside marriage was a sin and that it was solely for procreation.In saying that, he effectively condemned almost the whole of humanity as 'sinners'!!!It's a very outmoded attitude,but I had to wonder if it wasn't a much more prevalent way of thinking in Victorian times.
The Lock Hospitals treated V.D and tried to reform prostitutes to leave their 'lives of sin' behind.They were funded largely by charity and there is often an altruistic streak in the words of the people associated with them,a desire to help the women escape from the vicious circle of their lives of poverty and immorality.
The Guardians of the St Georges Union,London,provided many years ago 'a special lock hospital in the midst of low brothels and common lodging houses,the inhabitants of which were described by Mr Bond,the surgeon to the hospital as 'soldiers women,a low,dirty and wretched class,the shame of humanity'.Which is why he went around killing them.
Leave a comment:
-
I've just added my theory to my website.If you'd like to see it,go to the legal notice page,thanks
Leave a comment:
-
I've now added a paragraph about the 'Ripper' letters on page 3.I just want to highlight a couple of other points that I think deserve serious attention.It's interesting that other people suggest a member of the 'officer class' as a potential suspect.I think it's one of the most difficult barriers to cross and a question that still troubles me.Could a successful man be a serial killer?
Whoever suggested William Gull as a suspect was thinking along obvious lines,I expect everyone has mulled over the idea of a deranged gynaecologist.The daft bit is in proposing the Queen's doctor.Surely it makes more sense to consider a gynaecologist to the unfortunates?
Thomas Bond spent 8 years at the Lock Hospital.Any woman who was suspected of 'loose morals' could be arrested and forcibly examined.I've seen it described as rape by speculum.Eight years,thousands of women,constantly in contact with their cervixes.Now look at Mary Kelly.If you've ever wondered about Jack's previous criminal activity,Bond was involved in state sanctioned sexual abuse for 8 years.To add insult to injury they made them go to church.
Bond's hobby was chasing terrified woodland creatures for miles on horseback and watching as they were shot,beheaded and disembowelled(deer) or torn to shreds by hounds(fox).
Bond was appointed Surgeon to the Met. largely bacause he was the closest G.P. and it gave him the perfect cloak of respectability.It didn't make him good or honest,he was still a complete and utter turd.
Leave a comment:
-
Hi Phil,hope this clarifies my position a bit,the coincidences are too strong to dismiss lightly,I think.I hope to add a paragraph about the letters in the next day or two,thanksOriginally posted by elmore 77 View Post.
If I could just give a little background.I think it was last year Wynne Weston-Davies was posting here as Prosector about Jack's surgical skill and I was very impressed,so I bought his book.I remember him saying somewhere that he didn't think Bond had anything to do with the murders and,perhaps rather perversely I began pondering about the possibility that he was, in fact, the culprit.The more I looked,the more convinced I became that not only was he a good suspect for the WCM,but also the Torso murders.My website is five pages long,so can be read in 20 minutes and basically highlights a series of 'coincidences'and information that has been overlooked by most.
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: