A major breakthrough

[Observer]

I'm not sure he needs too, i.e. assuming, on the evidence I've seen so far, you might very well be the same poster!

Pierre, please reveal your true identity.

I'd retract that statement if i were you, that's a very serious breach of this Forums rules.

[Observer]

Where's he gone he was here a minute ago ? The cowards made off. Well, an apology will suffice JOHNG, otherwise I have no other course of action but to report you to admin, for an accusation of me breaching Forum rules.

[David Orsam]

People who observe might want to take a look at the forum rules about off-topic posts before reporting anyone to Admin.

"If a post contains nothing but rude insults to a specific poster, that is off-topic and against the rules."

Now, does ANYONE have anything else to say about Pierre's major breakthrough which has become a major non-breakthrough?

If not, perhaps this thread really is closed now.

[Observer]

Not only do you prove that you are wriggling deliciously on my hook (because I certainly expected you to post again) but you've now opened this thread back up to Pierre and everyone else, so anything that is posted in here from now on is entirely your fault.

Do you mean this sort of post?

[Observer]

Well I think we've established two things. Firstly, you didn't bother to read my post, and secondly you're a bit cranky.

By the way, maybe you'll consider joining in the debate I'm trying to have with Pierre about narcissistic personality disorder.

I'm sure you'll find it really interesting: the behaviour's characterized by excessive need for admiration and exaggerated feelings of self importance.

And you never know, you might find out something about yourself. And I'm sure you'll enjoy debating with Pierre-you obviously have so much in common.

Or perhaps this. I overlooked this one by the way.

[David Orsam]

Do you mean this sort of post?

No I didn't. But tell me, what is your purpose in continually posting in this thread? What are you hoping to achieve?

And do you have anything at all to say about Pierre's "major breakthrough"?

[Observer]

And, if you read my post, you will have seen that I offered JOHNG the alternative of an apology, as opposed to reporting him to admin.

[David Orsam]

I said this five posts ago but it's worth repeating.

Does ANYONE have anything else to say about Pierre's major breakthrough which has become a major non-breakthrough?

If not, perhaps this thread really is closed now.

[Observer]

No I didn't. But tell me, what is your purpose in continually posting in this thread? What are you hoping to achieve?

And do you have anything at all to say about Pierre's "major breakthrough"?

Go back to the source, I commented on my belief that Pierre was leading you and others up the garden path. If you care to re-read that section of this thread you will see that others were pointing out the very same thing, so my post was in line at that time with what was being discussed. You then decided in your wisdom to take me up on the point, and in effect the content of your replies were no different to mine, off topic, and rather rude. That's the top and bottom of it. I have no problem with posters having a go at me, in all the many years I've posted here i've not reported a single poster, and believe me what has just transpired here, is a Sunday school outing compared with some of the shenanigans that have transpired over the years. What I don't like however is being accused of acting in sock puppet mode.

[David Orsam]

Thank you for your off-topic observation about Pierre leading people up the garden path. I happen disagree with you, and have no idea what you are hoping to achieve by making such an observation, but any discussion about this will be off-topic so I simply repeat my question:

Do you have anything at all to say about Pierre's "major breakthrough"?

[Observer]

Do you have anything at all to say about Pierre's "major breakthrough"?

Yes, maybe he 's got something there.

[David Orsam]

Yes, maybe he 's got something there.

Okay great, I happen to disagree with you. I don't think he found anything of any value.

[Pierre]

And what exactly have you contributed in your 100 posts to this thread? Other than chasing Pierre around in circles?

Indeed. Or like this, David to the left, me to the right.



Regards, Pierre

[Pierre]

I guess you haven't bothered to read my posts in this thread, Harry, because the answer is very clear from the many questions I've asked to get clarification of the major breakthrough that was supposedly made and the points I've raised about the medical information Pierre has claimed to have found and about the nature of his research.

But if I want to chase Pierre around in circles about his major breakthrough then that's exactly what I'll do because that is the topic of this thread. Your posts are just pointless nonsense that have no bearing on anything and seem to just be chasing me personally because you are bored or something.

You are often off topic, David. But I donīt mind. People have been off topic for 128 years. Whatīs another year?

[David Orsam]

Whatīs another year?

Talking of another year Pierre, do you think that's how long it will take before you really do make a "major breakthrough" in this case?