A Human Tiger

[Fisherman]

I don't know if you caught my post #30 Fisherman but the picture of the section of skin (also described as a 'segment' (and of course it follows that the description flap or slip would equally fit)) is a clear, roughly square area of skin completely removed from the body-not attached by a sliver or tongue or attached to organs or formed as part of collateral damage...a completely separate portion of skin..

So a sibling to the Jackson, Chapman and Kelly cases, yes. Does the author offer any information about the perp (if he/she was identified, that is)?

[Fisherman]

You are a complete and utter clown !!!!!!!!!!!

www.trevormarriott.co.uk

We wonīt know that until I get a chance to communicate directly with Biggs. If he confirms your rather odd take on things as having originated with him, after having been fully informed, then you may actually have a point for once.

But we both know that he wonīt do that. And we both know that you will never give me direct access to Biggs. Letīs be frank enough to admit that, shall we?

In my world, clowns are people who think there is such a thing as "vaginal wall cartilage". After that whopper, you may want to apply a slightly humbler attitude to those of us who told you that you were wrong. I seem to remember that you mocked me about that too. And look where that got you...

Hereīs a quick recap of one of your posts on the subject, answering one of mine:

My post: "But there is no such thing as a cartilage wall in the vagina, Trevor. Has that not dawned on you yet? There is no cartilage at all in the vagina."

Your reply: "I think you wild find there is such a thing known as vaginal wall cartilage."

Now, lets add your last post to this: "You are a complete and utter clown !!!!!!!!!!"

Can you see how you come across, Trevor?

[Trevor Marriott]

We wonīt know that until I get a chance to communicate directly with Biggs. If he confirms your rather odd take on things as having originated with him, after having been fully informed, then you may actually have a point for once.

But we both know that he wonīt do that. And we both know that you will never give me direct access to Biggs. Letīs be frank enough to admit that, shall we?

In my world, clowns are people who think there is such a thing as "vaginal wall cartilage". After that whopper, you may want to apply a slightly humbler attitude to those of us who told you that you were wrong. I seem to remember that you mocked me about that too. And look where that got you...

I have mocked you on many things all justifiably so and I make no apologies for doing so.

And yet again you amaze us, you are a self proclaimed expert in crime scene investigations, forensic pathology and now you are now an expert in gynaecology, you know the saying "Jack of all trades master of none" which sums you up.

You have developed the art of answering a question with a question, you might be able to sway others on here but it cuts no ice with me, as I said I have closed the book on these torsos, and I sure you will continue to huff and puff about them to others highlighting things that in your "OPINION" show the work of a serial killer, interpreting the doctors reports and inquest testimony in a way which suits you.

The sad thing is that some on here really believe you

https://www.trevormarriott.co.uk

[Fisherman]

Trevor Marriott: I have mocked you on many things all justifiably so and I make no apologies for doing so.

Come on, Trevor - you are in no situation to mock anybody, and nobody is taking you seriously. Didnīt you know?

And yet again you amaze us, you are a self proclaimed expert in crime scene investigations, forensic pathology and now you are now an expert in gynaecology, you know the saying "Jack of all trades master of none" which sums you up.

I am here on the same terms as anybody else. I have the exact same right as anybody else to have an opinion about all the things involved in the case. I do not say that makes me an expert. You are the one trying to claim that I would somehow have proclaimed myself an expert, but as usual, there is no substance to it.

It does not take an expert in gynaecology to know that there is no cartilage in the vagina, by the way. I felt it was a very odd suggestion on your behalf, and I checked. It is not any harder than that. Anybody can check things before they make fools of themselves by not doing so.
You, if anyone, should be totally familiar with that fact by now.

You have developed the art of answering a question with a question, you might be able to sway others on here but it cuts no ice with me, as I said I have closed the book on these torsos, and I sure you will continue to huff and puff about them to others highlighting things that in your "OPINION" show the work of a serial killer, interpreting the doctors reports and inquest testimony in a way which suits you.

As if you didnīt...?

The sad thing is that some on here really believe you

No, Trevor, that is not the sad thing at all.

[Pierre]

Tigers, like most cats both large and small, attack their prey when it is most unsuspecting, particularly when its back is turned towards the predator.

A human tiger might be cunning and cold enough to gain a victim's trust, bide his time, then strike when she is most unsuspecting.

Hi PcDunn,

Indeed. That is a very good description.

But humans have other goals than do animals. What could a human tiger have wanted to achieve?

And was it visible in his signature?

Regards, Pierre

[David Orsam]

Someone posted on another thread that, "There is a tiger waiting in the wilderness."

Unfortunately a tiger won't last long in the wilderness. It needs a constant supply of fresh meat, around 10-25 pounds per day on average.

By my calculations, a tiger in the wilderness will expire after about 12 months.

[Pierre]

Someone posted on another thread that, "There is a tiger waiting in the wilderness."

Unfortunately a tiger won't last long in the wilderness. It needs a constant supply of fresh meat, around 10-25 pounds per day on average.

By my calculations, a tiger in the wilderness will expire after about 12 months.

I am searching the archives and have found a new piece of data that shows that I can not refuse the hypothesis. I am trying to do that but it is hopeless.

[Harry D]

About time the cat was let out of the bag.

[Henry Flower]

I am searching the archives and have found a new piece of data that shows that I can not refuse the hypothesis. I am trying to do that but it is hopeless.

Ah, those famous archives again. 'The archives'. The sort of generic bollocks no real historian would write. So Pierre, where are 'the archives' kept? Archive House? The International Centre for the Archiving of Archives? You are fooling nobody.

A new piece of data! The hypothesis! It is hopeless.

Hopeless.

Grow up, fool.

[GUT]

About time the cat was let out of the bag.

There is no cat.

[Pierre]

Ah, those famous archives again. 'The archives'. The sort of generic bollocks no real historian would write. So Pierre, where are 'the archives' kept? Archive House? The International Centre for the Archiving of Archives? You are fooling nobody.

A new piece of data! The hypothesis! It is hopeless.

Hopeless.

Grow up, fool.

These archives are police archives.

Regards, Pierre

[Henry Flower]

These archives are police archives.

Regards, Pierre

That's nice dear; and what are you today, scientist, judicial historian, or sociologist?

Maybe today you are a historian of the science of judicial sociology? Or a scientist in the socio-judicial historical field? Or a sociologist specialising in the history of judicial sciences?

"The best actors in the world, either for tragedy, comedy, history, pastoral, pastoral-comical, historical-pastoral, tragical-historical, tragical-comical-historical-pastoral, scene individable, or poem unlimited."