Ben, you may as well read my answers to David.
You try to pin a consistent, never-changing BMI on Thurman, I see, but that is not so. BMI:s change more than Ripperologists levels of ignorance vary. Thurman is NORMALLY on the mildly thin side, but may OCCASIONALLY end up on the normal side. Nicole Kidman, by the way, has been recorded as 16.4 . She has also been at higher levels, but she is normally on the mildly thin or moderately thin side.
Not that this has stopped her from working, eating, having a career, travelling over the world, working out etcetera.
You really need to stop your nonsense, Ben. We can all see that 17.3 is thin, but not by any means necessarily unhealthy. I have contaced an authority on this errand, so in a weeks time we can hopefully hear you say that I must have bored this authority enough to try and get rid of me by agreeing with me!
Posh Spice belongs in this category to, by the bye!
And a lot of other famed beauty queens.
Of course, they are writhing in pains when we look away, being close on the brink of death due to their freakishly thin bodies.
Or not.
I think you are the only person I met who believes that freakish thinness takes over where normal leaves off. I so wonder why? Could you have an agenda...? Anyway, if you have it is of course faulty!
It was very revealing to hear you first speaking cleverly about how my number one giant was not in England, so he did not count, only to instead claim that it did not matter that my giant number two also outpaced your tiny Yorkshire giant. Says a bit about how you argue, jumping from one type of argument to another as it suits you.
And in the end, the whole issue was never whether these ENGLISH giants travelled abroad or not, was it? It was about whether England produced men that were a lot taller that the man you claimed was Englands tallest.
My, that WOULD have suited you, would it not? But easy come easy go, Ben ... and that one just went.
All the best,
Fisherman
You try to pin a consistent, never-changing BMI on Thurman, I see, but that is not so. BMI:s change more than Ripperologists levels of ignorance vary. Thurman is NORMALLY on the mildly thin side, but may OCCASIONALLY end up on the normal side. Nicole Kidman, by the way, has been recorded as 16.4 . She has also been at higher levels, but she is normally on the mildly thin or moderately thin side.
Not that this has stopped her from working, eating, having a career, travelling over the world, working out etcetera.
You really need to stop your nonsense, Ben. We can all see that 17.3 is thin, but not by any means necessarily unhealthy. I have contaced an authority on this errand, so in a weeks time we can hopefully hear you say that I must have bored this authority enough to try and get rid of me by agreeing with me!
Posh Spice belongs in this category to, by the bye!
And a lot of other famed beauty queens.
Of course, they are writhing in pains when we look away, being close on the brink of death due to their freakishly thin bodies.
Or not.
I think you are the only person I met who believes that freakish thinness takes over where normal leaves off. I so wonder why? Could you have an agenda...? Anyway, if you have it is of course faulty!
It was very revealing to hear you first speaking cleverly about how my number one giant was not in England, so he did not count, only to instead claim that it did not matter that my giant number two also outpaced your tiny Yorkshire giant. Says a bit about how you argue, jumping from one type of argument to another as it suits you.
And in the end, the whole issue was never whether these ENGLISH giants travelled abroad or not, was it? It was about whether England produced men that were a lot taller that the man you claimed was Englands tallest.
My, that WOULD have suited you, would it not? But easy come easy go, Ben ... and that one just went.
All the best,
Fisherman
Comment