Where does Joseph Fleming fit into the equation?

[Cogidubnus]

E' did it with 'is palette knife guvnor

You sure that's the right artist Michael...To me his work lacks the essential symbolism...I thought it was this one (Impression d'automne) with it's symbolic six-leaved vines symbolising Martha Tabram and the C5...

http://www.desinformations.com/fonds.php?view=10

All the best

Dave

PS it's available in 6 ft 7 in lengths

[The Good Michael]

I hope that you've consulted all the surviving letters of Lautrec in order to demonstrate that he could have travelled to England on the dates in question before you publish your book?

He had an identical double...a Hungarian that spoke little English. No one ever talks about this.

Mike

[Sally]

Absolute nonsense. He was only 7'6" when Toulouse Lautrec was riding on his shoulders. They split up by the way to do the double murders. It was supposed to have been a simultaneous double deed, but Lautrec's little legs failed to get him to Mitre Square on time.

Mike

Ah - so it's true then? There was more than one hand in the Whitechapel Murders?

To be honest, I was always doubtful that Killeen could've done all that knee-walking by himself.

I hope that you've consulted all the surviving letters of Lautrec in order to demonstrate that he could have travelled to England on the dates in question before you publish your book?

[The Good Michael]

Oh yes, he was 7' 6", allegedly. However, he used habitually to walk on his knees in order to disguise his extraordinary height when he stalked the streets of Whitechapel.

That's what I call suspicious.

Absolute nonsense. He was only 7'6" when Toulouse Lautrec was riding on his shoulders. They split up by the way to do the double murders. It was supposed to have been a simultaneous double deed, but Lautrec's little legs failed to get him to Mitre Square on time.

Mike

[Sally]

Hello Sally



Well that's a fair point...was Killeen vertically advantaged?

All the best

Dave

Oh yes, he was 7' 6", allegedly. However, he used habitually to walk on his knees in order to disguise his extraordinary height when he stalked the streets of Whitechapel.

That's what I call suspicious.

[Cogidubnus]

With a small dark moustache....

Hello Sally

Of course it wasn't Freud - since when did he eviscerate women, eh?

I'm telling you, it was Killeen.

Well that's a fair point...was Killeen vertically advantaged?

All the best

Dave

[Fisherman]

Of course it wasn't Freud - since when did he eviscerate women, eh?

He turned more people inside out than any of our main subjects ...!

The best,
Fisherman

[richardnunweek]

Hi,
Its been many years since I discussed Barnett as any kind of suspect.
It is quite right to assume that his alibi for the night of the 8th/9th was verified, however it is not a absolute fact that Kelly was killed during his alibi verification.
If he also had a alibi[ not known] for the hours between 8-10 am on the 9th.then he would be exonerated full stop.
Regards Richard.

[Sally]

Now now jung man...Freud was born in 1856, so not so anachronistic!

As he seems not to have any particular whereabouts in 1888, can I claim my ten bob and put him down right now as a suspect? (I'm afraid he wasn't 6ft 7ins but does that disqualify him?)

All the best

Dave

Don't be ridiculous Dave - you suspect theorists You're all the same.

Of course it wasn't Freud - since when did he eviscerate women, eh?

I'm telling you, it was Killeen.

[Cogidubnus]

Now now jung man...Freud was born in 1856, so not so anachronistic!

As he seems not to have any particular whereabouts in 1888, can I claim my ten bob and put him down right now as a suspect? (I'm afraid he wasn't 6ft 7ins but does that disqualify him?)

All the best

Dave

[Phil H]

No - Victorian pronunciation emulated in writing.!!!

Freudian references are not allowed on Casebook as they are anachronistic.

Phil

[DVV]

So I wan't.

Freudian slip with an apostrophe.

[Phil H]

There's no point in having a dialogue with the deaf, DVV. So I wan't.

[DVV]

In my view, and as I have repeatedly suggested, it depends on the time Mary was killed and other assumptions made by the investigators.
Phil

I'd be sincerely pleased to learn at what o'clock Barnett becomes a good suspect.

[DVV]

I don't know how this thought could be even questioned.

Mike

Mike, that's because you choose to ignore the most telling fact that Barnett was in his late twenties - the perfect age to start a murdering career.
Not to mention his speech-impediment and his fish-knife.
Strong evidence, as all can see.
Now, as an open-minded person, I don't completely dismiss the possibility that Jack killed MJK.
But that's awfully classical, really not hype enough for my St-Tropez' friends and I, and sounds quite like André Verchuren's accordion.

Cheers