Druitt and Monro

[mklhawley]

To Darryl

But Macnaghten WAS upholding the law - the law of due process. You can't name a person as a murderer when they can never have a trial.
.
And no, Druitt - Winchester, Oxford, cricket - did not fit a preconceived idea of Macnaghten's as to the killer's identity. You are being misled by Mac again.

[mklhawley]

Macnaghten was handed Druitt on a platter, but what to do about it was the challenge

He had a close friend who could be seriously and publicly hurt by the solution.

Your negative perception of Macnaghten is not the one people had at the time. He was known to be generous, deferential and amiable, and free of snobbery, and so compassionate there were even ex-crims who admired him, e.g. for looking out for them as human beings after they were released

[GBinOz]

Had that been the case wouldn't we expect William to have known of Druitt's plans to go abroad on holiday, and what about the Kingston Park Cricket Club, wouldn't his friends have known he had plans to go away on holiday while the school is closed for the term?
It seems strange that the people you might normally discuss any potential vacation with, friends & relatives, had no idea of any such plans.
Have you ever gone abroad on holiday but not mentioned it to anyone at all?

Hi Jon,

Didn't the cricket club relieve him of his job as treasurer because he told them he was going abroad, and might not he have told William the same thing? That would explain why William wasn't initially concerned about him not having been seen at his chambers for over a week in early December. Perhaps it was only when he failed to turn up for the new school term that William became concerned.

Cheers, George

[mklhawley]

Based on newly found primary sources, the Hainsworths in their much unread book make a strong circumstantial case that it was William and cousin Charles who had escorted Montague abroad, specifically to a private, French asylum - a desperate and expensive plan which instantly backfired.

If Jon's and Chris' interpretation is correct then so was Macnaghten, e.g. when he wrote that Druitt had "disappeared" after the Kelly atrocity.

[Fiver]

Druitt was not "undetected" in his mental illness if he was placed in an asylum - it is claimed twice.

So the Hansworths are claiming that Druitt was placed in two different asylums?

Lets look at the Jan 13, 1889 Philadelphia Times.

* The report was made 24 December, 1888.
* About 10 days before that, Scotland yard was informed by the French Detective Department, so roughly 14 December, 1888.
* French Detective Department had been contacted by an attendant from an asylum a few days before, so roughly 11 December.
* Three weeks previous to that, a man had been brought to the asylum, so roughly 20 November.

Which means the man, if he ever existed, was not Montague Druitt, who appeared in court at the Royal Courts of Justice on 27 November, 1888.

* About a month before the man was brought to the asylum, the asylum director received a letter asking to transfer him there, so roughly 20 October.
* One of the Scotland Yard detectives visited the asylum, which would somewhere between 14 December and 24 December and gave the ploice the names of "at least half a dozen real or fancied confederates".
* There were no clues as to the man's identity - "not even the linen is initialed".

Yet this man, supposed to be Druitt, has to escape from the asylum, under the noses of both Scotland Yard and the French police, make it back to London, sneak into his quarters undetected to grab two checks and a second half return for Hammersmith to Charing Cross, dated 1 December, which is rather a trick since he would have been in the French asylum at the time it was issued, and then drown himself.

If this man ever existed, he cannot be Montague Druitt.

[Fiver]

Druitt was not accused of sexual misconduct. Not a single extant sources even hints at such an event.

Almost everyone on the thread has said Druitt might have been dismissed for sexual misconduct.

You yourself said "For example, it proved our long-standing contetiuon that Jack Littlechild initiated the correspndence with Sims about Tumblety, because of being perplexed by a column by the famous writer claiming a certain rich, reclusive gentile who committed suicide is the solution; that clearly Sims, along with Macnaghten, were the originators of the plot of "The Lodger"; that Sims and Mac knew Druitt was a lodger in Blackheath; that Druitt had been young, handsome, with sketchy medical credentials and had left the school under a cloud due to his HETEROsexual attentions to a woman."

Yet when I say Druitt "possibly engaged in sexual misconduct", you call me a troll.

[mklhawley]

To other readers...

In their book, the Hainsworths themselves say the Jan 13 1889 article may not be about Druitt; it may in fact be entirely made up They also point out that the raving patient seems to be still in this French asylum long after Druitt was deceased.

Yet the authors are judicious - unlike certain posters here - at examining sources from one angle and then from another.

If you dip into their book and their chapter on this ,"The English Patient", you will find it is a tour de force of historical analysis. In meticulous detail they measure this tantalizing source against a range of other primary sources (wrongly called "period sources" by Fiver?) which does not mean you have to agree with their provisional conclusion - nor is this aspect of the case pivotal to Druitt's guilt, or lack thereof.