Rosella's post is very good and has an understanding of the social standing of the Druitts and how the finances were organised.
All this talk of Grand tour is nonsense, there are people posting who don't understand the context of what they discuss.
The Grand Tour was an aristocratic event. In the 18th century Aristocratic sons were send with a companion to tour Greece, Italy,and sometimes the Middle East, to improve their cultural knowledge and bring back artifacts to enrich their stately homes.
It was very expensive and usually took about a year or longer.
This had died out by the railway age.
The Druitts were upper middle class, the professional class that produced lawyers and doctors. They were educated but had to work for a living.
They were not Gentry or Aristocrats with inherited wealth.
Rosella supposition makes the most sense, in that it is possible that Druitt spend a few months at home supporting his family while deciding on his future.He would have been expected to stay at home.
Miss Marple
All this talk of Grand tour is nonsense, there are people posting who don't understand the context of what they discuss.
The Grand Tour was an aristocratic event. In the 18th century Aristocratic sons were send with a companion to tour Greece, Italy,and sometimes the Middle East, to improve their cultural knowledge and bring back artifacts to enrich their stately homes.
It was very expensive and usually took about a year or longer.
This had died out by the railway age.
The Druitts were upper middle class, the professional class that produced lawyers and doctors. They were educated but had to work for a living.
They were not Gentry or Aristocrats with inherited wealth.
Rosella supposition makes the most sense, in that it is possible that Druitt spend a few months at home supporting his family while deciding on his future.He would have been expected to stay at home.
Miss Marple
Comment